Abstract

The GM technology in food products in China takes the leading position around the world, but the technology is hotly disputed by general public. This study uses risk amplification effect model and take “2013 GM Cyber-Controversy” in China as an example. The authors analyze the process how the risk on GM technology in China expanded. Then points out the liability subject of the process and the consequence of the risk amplification. Finally, the paper provides some valuable suggestions on risk control of GM foods based on the results of the analysis.

Keywords:

Case analysis, GM foods, GM technology, risk amplification, risk control,

References

1. Bredahl, L., K.G. Grunert and L.J. Frewer, 1998. Consumer attitudes and decision-making with regard to genetically engineered food products-a review of the literature and a presentation of models for future research [J]. J. Consum. Policy, 21(3): 251-277.
   CrossRef    
2. Dreezens, E., C. Martijn, P. Tenbült, G. Kok and N.K. de Vries, 2005. Food and values: An examination of values underlying attitudes toward genetically modified- and organically grown food products [J]. Appetite, 44: 115-122.
   CrossRef    PMid:15604038    
3. Guan, K., 2012. An analysis of stakeholder of genetically modified plants & food [J]. Stud. Dialectics Nat., 28(7): 89-94.
   
4. Jiang, P., 2010. How can the media construct an image of genetically modified technology: An analysis based on influential domestic newspapers in 2010 [J]. J. Nanijng Agric. Univ., Soc. Sci., 12(2): 101-109.
   
5. Kasperson, R.E., O. Renn, P. Slovic, H.S. Brown, J. Emel, R. Goble, J.X. Kasperson and S. Ratick, 1988. The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework [J]. Risk Anal., 8(2): 177-187.
   CrossRef    
6. Tan, Y., 2006. Study on the object and process of public participatory technology based on the case of genetically modified technology [J]. Stud. Sci. Sci., 2006(2): 30-25.
   
7. Verdurme, A. and J. Viaene, 2003. Consumer beliefs and attitude towards genetically modified food: Basis for segmentation and implications for communication [J]. Agribusiness, 19(1): 91-113.
   CrossRef    
8. Xiao-Yan, W., 2012. Genetically modified crops’ commercialization and its risk regulation: From the ANT perspective [J]. Stud. Philos. Sci. Technol., 29(4): 104-108.
   
9. Zheng, Q., 2014. Analysis on the debate of GM technology-form the perspective of post normal science [J]. 30(11): 60-66.
   

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.