Home            Contact us            FAQs
    
      Journal Home      |      Aim & Scope     |     Author(s) Information      |      Editorial Board      |      MSP Download Statistics

     Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology


Difference Analysis of Different Land Use Types on Soil Organic Carbon in Loess Gullied-Hilly Region of China

Jianing Zhang, Min Xu and Faqi Wu
College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, No. 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology  2015  4:274-280
http://dx.doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.7.1307  |  © The Author(s) 2015
Received: July ‎18, ‎2014  |  Accepted: August ‎26, ‎2014  |  Published: February 10, 2015

Abstract

The cycles of carbon in terrestrial ecosystems has received increasing attention worldwide. Because the balance between inputs and outputs of carbon to the soil has an important influences on the atmospheric CO2 and global climate. With the increasing deforestation and overgrazing, the impact of human disturbances on carbon storage and fluxes have exceeded the rate and extent of effects from natural variability, this could significantly raise the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. Thus, accurate estimations of land use and land cover in soil ecosystem have become increasingly important for estimating the carbon balance of regions. One of the greatest uncertainties concerning the influence of human activities is changes in soil carbon stock. In this study, soil samples were collected form farmland, orchard, woodland, grassland, wasteland five different land use types. Each soil sample core was separated into 0-10, 10-20, 20-40 and 40-60 cm depth. The study revealed the difference of soil carbon pool storage and mass effect in different land use styles by the contrast analysis of total organic carbon, labile organic carbon and carbon management index in number, distribution and changes. The results showed that there were big differences for the density of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) among different land use types, which means soil organic carbon storages were different. The extent of variation of the mass fraction of TOC and LOC was increase with the increase of soil depth and 0-20 cm layer was significantly greater than 20-60 cm layer. Relative to wasteland, the density of LOC and NLOC, total organic carbon storage and carbon management index for other four land use types were higher, especial for woodland and grassland. The woodland use type and grassland use type were significantly increased the carbon management index and improved the quality of soil carbon pool. The change of soil organic carbon reserve is huge influenced by human land use.

Keywords:

Carbon management index, carbon pool, land use, LOC, NLOC, SOC,


References

  1. Blair, G.J., R.D.B. Lefroy and L. Lisle, 1995. Soil carbon fractions based on their degree of oxidation and the development of a carbon management index for agricultural systems. Aust. J. Agr. Res., 46: 1459-1466.
    CrossRef    
  2. Cambardella, C.A. and E.T. Elliott, 1992. Particulate soil organic matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 56: 777-783.
    CrossRef    
  3. Degryze, S., J. Six, K. Paustian, S.J. Morris, E.A. Paul and R. Merckx, 2004. Soil organic carbon pool changes following land-use conversions. Glob. Change Biol., 10: 1120-1132.
    CrossRef    
  4. Ellert, B.H. and J.R. Bettany, 1995. Calculation of organic matter and nutrients stored in soils under contrasting management regimes. Can. J. Soil Sci., 75: 529-538.
    CrossRef    
  5. Gregorich, G., P. Rochette, S. McGuire, B.C. Liang and R. Lessard, 1998. Soluble organic carbon and carbon dioxide fluxes in maize fields receiving spring applied manure. J. Environ. Qual., 27: 209-214.
    CrossRef    
  6. Leifeld, J. and I. Kögel-Knabner, 2005. Soil organic matter fractions as early indicators for carbon stock changes under different land-use. Geoderma, 124(1/2): 143-155.
    CrossRef    
  7. Murty, D.M., U.F. Kirschbaum, R.R. Mcmurtrie and H. Mcgilvray, 2002. Does conversion of forest to agricultural land change soil carbon and nitrogen? A review of the literatures. Glob. Change Biol., 8: 105-123.
    CrossRef    
  8. Nelson, E.D.W. and L.E. Sommers, 1982. Total Carbon, Organic Carbon and Organic Matter. In: Page, A.L., R.H. Miller and D.R. Keeney (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbial Properties. Agronomy Society of America, Agronomy Monograph 9. Madison, Wisconsin, pp: 539-552.
  9. Partyka, T. and Z. Hamkalo, 2010. Estimation of oxidizing ability of organic matter of forest and arable soil. Zemdirbyste, 97(1): 33-40.
  10. Post, W.M., T.H. Peng, W.R. Emanuel, A.W. King, V.H. Dale and D.L. DeAngelis, 1990. The global carbon cycle. Am. Sci., 78: 310-326.
  11. Post, W.M. and K.C. Kwon, 2000. Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: Processes and potential. Glob. Change Biol., 6: 317-327.
    CrossRef    
  12. Richter, D.D., D. Markewitz, S.E. Trumbore and G.C. Wells, 1999. Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest. Nature, 400: 56-58.
    CrossRef    
  13. Tirol-Padre, A. and J.K. Ladha, 2004. Assessing the reliability of permanganate-oxidizable carbon as an index of soil labile carbon. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 68: 969-978.
    CrossRef    
  14. Vieira, F.C.B., A.C. Bayer, J.A. Zanatta, J. Dieckow, J. Mielniczuk and Z.L. He, 2007. Carbon management index based on physical fractionation of soil organic matter in an Acrisol under long-term no-till cropping systems. Soil Till. Res., 96(1/2): 195-204.
    CrossRef    
  15. Xu, M.G., R. Yu, X.F. Sun, H. Liu, B.R. Wang and J.M. Li, 2006. Effects of long-term fertilization on labile organic matter and Carbon Management Index (CMI) of the typical soils of China. Plant Nutr. Fertil. Sci., 12(4): 459-465.
  16. Xue, S., G.B. Liu, Y.P. Pan, Q.H. Dai, C. Zhang et al., 2009. Evolution of soil labile organic matter and carbon management index in the Artificial robinia of loess hilly area. Sci. Agric. Sinica, 42(4): 1458-1464.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.

ISSN (Online):  2042-4876
ISSN (Print):   2042-4868
Submit Manuscript
   Information
   Sales & Services
Home   |  Contact us   |  About us   |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2024. MAXWELL Scientific Publication Corp., All rights reserved