Home            Contact us            FAQs
    
      Journal Home      |      Aim & Scope     |     Author(s) Information      |      Editorial Board      |      MSP Download Statistics

     Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology


Assessment on the Food Management Quality Based on the Method of Improving TOPSIS

Mengyan Wang
Henan College of Finance and Taxation, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology  2015  10:745-748
http://dx.doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.9.1652  |  © The Author(s) 2015
Received: March ‎3, ‎2015  |  Accepted: March ‎14, ‎2015  |  Published: September 20, 2015

Abstract

Based on the analysis of the existing methods of evaluating foods, this study puts forward a comprehensive evaluation method for Foods quality to improve TOPSIS method, so as to avoid the problem of the scheme of the ideal solution and the negative ideal solution is too close to the problem, which can improve the scientific and reasonable feature of the traditional TOPSIS method. The development of the society has an increasing requirements for the food management quality in the future. Food management education is a public compulsory course for students who are in higher normal colleges, which is with distinctive feature of normal education and is closely related to the important course for training the qualified foods.

Keywords:

Food management, qualified foods, TOPSIS method,


References

  1. Hwang, C.L. and K. Yoon, 1981. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York.
    CrossRef    PMCid:PMC1214490    
  2. Jia, B.B., 2009. Build a diversified teacher evaluation system. Chinese Sci. Educ. Innov. Trib., 32: 234-240.
    Direct Link
  3. Ming, H., 2009. Evaluation of university teachers performance management. J. South China Norm. Univ., 4: 133-135.
  4. Pedrycz, W., 2007. Fuzzy neural networks with reference evaluation as pattern classifiers education. IEEE T. Neural Networ., 3: 36- 37.
  5. Satty, T.L, 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
    Direct Link
  6. Tong, Q., 2010. University teachers performance appraisal index system based on BSC theory research. Stat. Decis., 2: 73-75.
  7. Ye, B., 2008. Revolution and its reason of American colleges evaluation research based on TOPSIS. J. Educ., 14(5): 74-80.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.

ISSN (Online):  2042-4876
ISSN (Print):   2042-4868
Submit Manuscript
   Information
   Sales & Services
Home   |  Contact us   |  About us   |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2024. MAXWELL Scientific Publication Corp., All rights reserved