Home            Contact us            FAQs
    
      Journal Home      |      Aim & Scope     |     Author(s) Information      |      Editorial Board      |      MSP Download Statistics

     Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology


Compare Two Contrasting Breeds of Pigs Postmortem for Differential Protein Expression in Relation to Meat Quality

1Daofeng Qu, 1Jianzhong Han, 1Kaili Jia, 1Luoting Ye, 2Xinjie Wang, 3Xiaoning Liu, 1Yang Shen and 1Keke Ye
1Food Science and Engineering the Most Important Discipline of Zhejiang Province, School of Food Science and Biotechnology, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310035
2Jinhua Polytechnic, No.1188 Wuzhou Street, Jinhua, Zhejiang
3Logistics Center Quarantine Station of Yuhang District Agricultural Bureau, Hangzhou 310029, P.R. China
Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology   2015  8:626-632
http://dx.doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.9.1978  |  © The Author(s) 2015
Received: April ‎14, ‎2015  |  Accepted: May ‎10, ‎2015  |  Published: September 10, 2015

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the postmortem changes of muscle proteins and their relationships between these changes and meat quality traits. Six Jinhua and 6 crossbred (Duroc×Landrace×Yorkshire) male pigs at 180 d were used to determine the post-mortem changes of meat during the storage. Differential proteins between Jinhua pigs and crossbred pigs were profiled and identified by the application of two-dimensional electrophoresis and Mass Spectrometry. Two-dimensional electrophoresis results showed that the expression level of 27 proteins from different breeds of pigs varied during postmortem time (6, 24, 48 and 72 h) and 16 of them was up-regulated in Jinhua pigs (p<0.05). Furthermore, the structure and function of 12 proteins were identified by the application of Mass Spectrometry and referring to the protein database. Analysis showed that heat shock protein 27, desmin, β- enolase and pyruvate kinase were highly correlated with the integrity of meat tenderness, water-holding capacity as well as shelf life.

Keywords:

Factors, food security, KAP, young teachers,


References

  1. Bao, E., K.R. Sultan, N. Bernhard and J. Hartung, 2009. Expression of heat shock proteins in tissues from young pigs exposed to transport stress. Deut. Tierarztl. Woch. , 116: 321-325.
  2. Beaulieu, A.D., J.L. Aalhus, N.H. Williams and J.F. Patience, 2010. Impact of piglet birth weight, birth order and litter size on subsequent growth performance, carcass quality, muscle composition and eating quality of pork. J. Anim. Sci., 88: 2767-2778.
    CrossRef    PMid:20418451    
  3. Bendixen, E., 2005. The use of proteomics in meat science. Meat Sci., 71: 138-149.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.03.013
    CrossRef    PMid:22064059    
  4. Bolten, K.E., A.E. Marsh, S.M. Reed, J.P. Dubey, R.E. Toribio and W.J. Saville, 2008. Sarcocystis neurona: Molecular characterization of enolase domain I region and a comparison to other protozoa. Exp. Parasitol., 120: 108-112.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2008.05.004
    CrossRef    PMid:18625501    
  5. Dutaud, D., L. Aubry, M.A. Sentandreu and A. Ouali, 2006. Bovine muscle 20S proteasome: I. Simple purification procedure and enzymatic characterization in relation with postmortem conditions. Meat Sci., 74: 327-336.
    CrossRef    PMid:22062843     
  6. Fan, G.C., Q. Yuan and E.G. Kranias, 2008. Regulatory roles of junctin in sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium cycling and myocardial function. Trends Cardiovas. Med., 18: 1-5.
    CrossRef    PMid:18206802 PMCid:PMC2593792    
  7. Guo, J., T. Shan, T. Wu, L.N. Zhu, Y. Ren, S. An and Y. Wang, 2011. Comparisons of different muscle metabolic enzymes and muscle fiber types in Jinhua and Landrace pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 89: 185-191.
    CrossRef    PMid:20889683    
  8. Hollung, K., E. Veiseth, X. Jia, E.M. Faergestad and K.I. Hildrum, 2007. Application of proteomics to understand the molecular mechanisms behind meat quality. Meat Sci., 77: 97-104.
    CrossRef    PMid:22061400    
  9. Kim, N.K., S. Cho, S.H. Lee, H.R. Park, C.S. Lee, Y.M. Cho, Y.H. Choy, D. Yoon, S.K. Im and E.W. Park, 2008. Proteins in longissimus muscle of Korean native cattle and their relationship to meat quality. Meat Sci., 80: 1068-1073.
    CrossRef    PMid:22063838    
  10. Lametsch, R. and E. Bendixen, 2001. Proteome analysis applied to meat science: Characterizing postmortem changes in porcine muscle. J. Agr. Food Chem., 49: 4531-4537.
    CrossRef    PMid:11599984    
  11. Lametsch, R., P. Roepstorff and E. Bendixen, 2002. Identification of protein degradation during post-mortem storage of pig meat. J. Agr. Food Chem., 50: 5508-5512.
    CrossRef    PMid:12236671    
  12. Lametsch, R., A. Karlsson, K. Rosenvold, H.J. Andersen, P. Roepstorff and E. Bendixen, 2003. Postmortem proteome changes of porcine muscle related to tenderness. J. Agr. Food Chem., 51: 6992-6997.
    CrossRef    PMid:14611160    
  13. Lametsch, R., P. Roepstorff, H.S. Moller and E. Bendixen, 2004. Identification of myofibrillar substrates for mu-calpain. Meat Sci., 68: 515-521.
    CrossRef    PMid:22062527    
  14. Miao, Z.G., L.J. Wang, Z.R. Xu, J.F. Huang and Y.R. Wang, 2009. Developmental changes of carcass composition, meat quality and organs in the Jinhua pig and Landrace. Animal, 3: 468-473.
    CrossRef    PMid:22444318    
  15. Morzel, M., C. Terlouw, C. Chambon, D. Micol and B. Picard, 2008. Muscle proteome and meat eating qualities of Longissimus thoracis of "Blonde d'Aquitaine" young bulls: A central role of HSP27 isoforms. Meat Sci., 78: 297-304.
    CrossRef    PMid:22062282    
  16. Picariello, G., A. De Martino, G. Mamone, P. Ferranti, F. Addeo, M. Faccia, S. Spagnamusso and A. Di Luccia, 2006. Proteomic study of muscle sarcoplasmic proteins using AUT-PAGE/SDS-PAGE as two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. B, 833: 101-108.
    CrossRef    PMid:16503425    
  17. Pulford, D.J., P. Dobbie, S. Fraga Vazquez, E. Fraser-Smith, D.A. Frost and C.A. Morris, 2008a. Variation in bull beef quality due to ultimate muscle pH is correlated to endopeptidase and small heat shock protein levels. Meat Sci., 83: 1-9.
    CrossRef    PMid:20416615    
  18. Pulford, D.J., S. Fraga Vazquez, D.F. Frost, E. Fraser-Smith, P. Dobbie and K. Rosenvold, 2008b. The intracellular distribution of small heat shock proteins in post-mortem beef is determined by ultimate pH. Meat Sci., 79: 623-630.
    CrossRef    PMid:22063023     
  19. Ren, A., H. Zhang, Z. Xie, X. Ma, W. Ji, Z. He et al., 2012. Regulation of hippocampus-dependent memory by the zinc finger protein Zbtb20 in mature CA1 neurons. J. Physiol., 590: 4917-32.https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2012.234187
    CrossRef    PMid:22777671 PMCid:PMC3487045    
  20. Robert, N., M. Briand, R. Taylor and Y. Briand, 1999. The effect of proteasome on myofibrillar structures in bovine skeletal muscle. Meat Sci., 51: 149-153.
    CrossRef    
  21. Theron, L., T. Sayd, J. Pinguet, C. Chambon, N. Robert and V. Sante-Lhoutellier, 2011. Proteomic analysis of semimembranosus and biceps femoris muscles from Bayonne dry-cured ham. Meat Sci., 88: 82-90.
    CrossRef    PMid:21236590    
  22. Van de Wiel, D.F. and W.L. Zhang, 2007. Identification of pork quality parameters by proteomics. Meat Sci., 77: 46-54.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.04.017
    CrossRef    PMid:22061395    
  23. Zellner, M., R. Babeluk, L.H. Jakobsen, C. Gerner, E. Umlauf, I. Volf, E. Roth and J. Kondrup, 2011. A proteomics study reveals a predominant change in MaoB expression in platelets of healthy volunteers after high protein meat diet: Relationship to the methylation cycle. J. Neural Transm., 118: 653-662.
    CrossRef    PMid:21424576    
  24. Zhang, M., Y. Lv, Z. Yue, A. Islam, B. Rehana, E. Bao and J. Hartung, 2011. Effects of transportation on expression of Hsp90, Hsp70, Hsp27 and alphaB-crystallin in the pig stomach. Vet. Rec., 169: 312.
    CrossRef    PMid:21862472    
  25. Zheng, X., L. Hong, L. Shi, J. Guo, Z. Sun and J. Zhou, 2008. Proteomics analysis of host cells infected with infectious bursal disease virus. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 7: 612-625.
    CrossRef    PMid:18056921    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.

ISSN (Online):  2042-4876
ISSN (Print):   2042-4868
Submit Manuscript
   Information
   Sales & Services
Home   |  Contact us   |  About us   |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2024. MAXWELL Scientific Publication Corp., All rights reserved