Research Article | OPEN ACCESS
A Proposed Website to Evaluate the Academic Performance in College of Sciences and Arts in Unaizah
1Hussain Abu-Dalbouh, 2Eman Al-Roieshdie, 3Amani Al-Otaibi, 3Bashaier Al-Ma7ana, 3Hanan Al-Mutairi, 3Mona Al-Mutairi and 3Nawal Al-Harbi
1Department of Computer Sciences
2Department of Biology, College Sciences and Arts in Unaizah, Al-Qassim University, Saudi Arabia
3Bachelor in Computer Science, College Sciences and Arts in Unaizah, Al-Qassim University, Saudi Arabia
Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 2015 12:1305-1319
Received: May 20, 2015 | Accepted: June 22, 2015 | Published: December 25, 2015
Abstract
One of the main aims of deanship of quality assurance and accreditation in higher education is evaluated the academic and institutional performance. Therefore, effective evaluation is necessary in order to ensure academic and institutional adequately meet the requirements and teaching processing needs. A number of studies have proposed evaluation frameworks to aid in evaluation academic and institutional performance work. The students for evaluation the performance of academic and institutional have a lack of knowledge to examine and evaluate some points in the questionnaire and did not answer to the questionnaire seriously either. Thus, the questionnaire results will led to take and adopt wrong policies and decisions by the deanship of quality assurance and accreditation based on the fake feedback from the students and became the focus of concern and confusion for many academics. It is also in this confusing and difficult situation, academics sometimes disagreed regarding the questionnaire. This study aims to develop a website solution that could support students and quality unit in evaluation academic and institutional performance work in order to get the right feedback from students. This study indicated that the working environment would be improved by reducing the margin of errors or damages and the loss of some papers relating to the evaluation academic and institutional performance. It also by allowing the quality unit to assess the website and determine the improvement or complications based on the results of the evaluation process through the proposed website.
Keywords:
Evaluation , higher education, performance , quality , website,
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests.
Open Access Policy
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Copyright
The authors have no competing interests.
|
|
 |
ISSN (Online): 2040-7467
ISSN (Print): 2040-7459 |
 |
| Information |
|
|
|
|
| Sales & Services |
|
|
|
|
