Abstract

This study considers the use of systematic creativity tools for concept generation belonging to C-K theory and TRIZ, in addition to traditional ones used for product development. The aim of this study is twofold. On one hand, it aims to contribute to the improvement of the creative and innovation skills of engineering students and designers in general by the introduction of specific creativity enhancement tools. On the other hand, it proposes a method for evaluating the training and learning outcomes of the students involved in the courses based on Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation and used a questionnaire to collect students' answers and opinions. This way, some practical cases are carried on and two of these are presented in detail: one concerning the ideation of a new kind of gym towel and one concerning the analysis of a knee implant for total knee replacement surgery for possible improvements. The questionnaire results show that students considered the training and learning experiences and the use of the two new methods in a positive way. In particular, TRIZ method represents the most appreciated at all, while C-K theory is revealed as the newest one and very promising for the students’ future professional development.

Keywords:

Concept generation, creativity in design, C-K theory, engineering education, Kirkpatrick levels of evaluation , TRIZ, training and learning evaluation,

References

1. Agogué, M. and A. Kazakçi, 2014. 10 Years of C-K Theory: A Survey on the Academic and Industrial Impacts of a Design Theory. In: Chakrabarti, A. and L.T.M. Blessing (Eds.), An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design. Springer-Verlag, London, pp: 219-235.
   CrossRef    
2. Altshuller, G., 1996. And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, The Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. Technical Innovation Center Inc., Worcester, MA.
   
3. Altshuller, G., 1999. Innovation Algorithm: TRIZ, Systematic Innovation and Technical Creativity. Technical Innovation Center Inc., Worcester, MA.
   PMCid:PMC1171697    
4. Alves, J., M. Marques, I. Saur and P. Marques, 2007. Creativity and innovation through multidisciplinary and multisectoral cooperation. Creat. Innov. Manage., 16(1): 27-34.
   CrossRef    
5. Barak, M., 2004. Systematic approaches for inventive thinking and problem-solving: Implications for engineering education. Int. J. Eng. Educ., 20(4): 612-618.
   
6. Belski, I., 2009. Teaching thinking and problem solving at university: A course on TRIZ. Creat. Innov. Manage., 18(2): 101-108.
   CrossRef    
7. Benabid, Y., A. Aoussat and T. Chettibi, 2011. Design of high-flexion total knee prosthesis considering activities of North African peoples. Comput. Method. Biomec., 14(Supplement 1): 21-23.
   CrossRef    
8. Blanchard, P., P. Corsi and J.M. Charruault, 2013. First Steps in Fielding C-K Theory. How to Design Breakthrough Innovations with C-K Theory. A Series of Companion iBooks on Using C-K Theory-August 2013. Vol. 1. Philippe Blanchard-Patrick Corsi.
   
9. Blanchard, P., P. Corsi and J.M. Charruault, 2014. First Steps in Driving C-K Ateliers. How to Conduct Innovation Ateliers with C-K Theory. A Series of Companion iBooks on Using C-K Theory-May 2014. Vol. 2. Blanchard-Corsi.
   
10. Carr, B.C. and T. Goswami, 2009. Knee implants – Review of models and biomechanics. Mater. Design, 30(2): 398-413.
    CrossRef    
11. Choulier, D. and P.A. Weite, 2011. A coherent and discriminating skills standard for innovative design. DS 68-8: Proceeding of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED, 2011). Impacting Society through Engineering Design, Design Education, Lyngby/Copenhagen, Denmark , Vol. 8.
    
12. Chulvi, V., E. Mulet, A. Chakrabarti, B. López-Mesa and C. González-Cruz, 2012. Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methods. J. Eng. Des., 23(4): 241-269.
    CrossRef    
13. Chulvi, V., M.C. González-Cruz, E. Mulet and J. Aguilar-Zambrano, 2013. Influence of the type of idea-generation method on the creativity of solutions. Res. Eng. Des., 24(1): 33-41.
    CrossRef    
14. De Vere, I., 2009. Developing creative engineers: A design approach to engineering education. Proceeding of the 11th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE09). Brighton, UK.
    PMid:18987893    
15. Filippi, S., B. Motyl and F.M. Ciappina, 2011. Classifying TRIZ methods to speed up their adoption and the ROI for SMEs. Proc. Eng., 9: 172-182.
    CrossRef    
16. Gadd, K., 2011. TRIZ for Engineers: Enabling Inventive Problem Solving. Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex.
    CrossRef    
17. Genco, N., K. Hölttä-Otto and C.C. Seepersad, 2012. An experimental investigation of the innovation capabilities of undergraduate engineering students. J. Eng. Educ., 101(1): 60-81.
    CrossRef    
18. Hatchuel, A. and B. Weil, 2003. A new approach of innovative Design: an introduction to C-K theory. Proceeding of the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED, 2003). Stockholm, pp: 109-110.
    
19. Hatchuel, A., P. Le Masson and B. Weil, 2004. C-K theory in practice: Lessons from industrial applications. DS 32: Proceeding of the 8th International Design Conference. Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp: 245-258.
    
20. Hipple, J., 2005. The integration of TRIZ with other ideation tools and processes as well as with psychological assessment tools. Creat. Innov. Manage., 14(1): 22-33.
    CrossRef    
21. Hooge, S., M. Agogué and T. Gillier, 2012. A new methodology for advanced engineering design: Lessons from experimenting C-K theory driven tools. DS 70: Proceeding of the 12th International Design Conference. Dubrovnik, Croatia.
    
22. Howard, T.J., S.J. Culley and E.A. Dekoninck, 2009. Stimulating creativity: A more practical alternative to TRIZ. DS 58-5: Proceeding of the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED, 09). Vol. 5, Design Methods and Tools (pt. 1). Palo Alto, CA, USA, pp: 205-216.
    
23. Hsu, Y.L., Y.C. Hung and J.Z. Yin, 2006. Design of a novel total knee prosthesis using TRIZ. J. Med. Biol. Eng., 26(4): 177-185.
    
24. Ilevbare, I.M., D. Probert and R. Phaal, 2013. A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice. Technovation, 33(2-3): 30-37.
    CrossRef    
25. Kirkpatrick, J., 2007. The hidden power of Kirkpatrick's four levels. T+D, 61(8): 34-37.
    
26. Le Masson, P., A. Hatchuel and B. Weil, 2007. Creativity and design reasoning: How C-K theory can enhance creative design. Proceeding of the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design Guidelines for a Decision Support Method Adapted to NPD Processes (ICED'07), Paris, France, pp: 357-358.
    
27. Le Masson, P., B. Weil and A. Hatchuel, 2010. Strategic Management of Innovation and Design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York.
    
28. Lombardo, B.J. and D.J. Roddy, 2011. Cultivating organizational creativity in an age of complexity: A companion study to the IBM 2010 global chief human resource officer study. Executive Report, IBM Institute for Business Value, Somers, NY.
    
29. Moehrle, M.G., 2005. How combinations of TRIZ tools are used in companies – results of a cluster analysis. R &D Manage., 35(3): 285-296.
    CrossRef    
30. Motyl, B. and S. Filippi, 2014a. Integration of creativity enhancement tools in medical device design process. Proc. Eng., 69: 1316-1325.
    CrossRef    
31. Motyl, B. and S. Filippi, 2014b. Comparison of Creativity Enhancement and Idea Generation Methods in Engineering Design Training. In: Kurosu, M. (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction. Theories, Methods, and Tools. Lecture Notes on Computer Science, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 8510: 242-250.
    
32. Nägerl, H., K.H. Frosch, M.M. Wachowski, C. Dumont, C. Abicht, P. Adam and D. Kubein-Meesenburg, 2008. A novel total knee replacement by rolling articulating surfaces. In vivo functional measurements and tests. Acta Bioeng. Biomech., 10(1): 55-60.
    PMid:18634354    
33. Nakagawa, T., 2011. Education and training of creative problem solving thinking with TRIZ/USIT. Proc. Eng., 9: 582-595.
    CrossRef    
34. Praslova, L., 2010. Adaptation of Kirkpatrick's four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in higher education. Educ. Assess. Evaluat. Account., 22(3): 215-225.
    CrossRef    
35. Rantanen, K. and E. Domb, 2002. Simplified TRIZ: New Problem Solving Applications for Engineers and Manufacturing Professionals. St Lucie Press, Boca Raton - FL.
    CrossRef    PMCid:PMC2750316    
36. Roussel, B., R. Bary and M. Ferioli, 2012. Method of creativity including an ideas evaluation tool: Application in an international workshop. DS 70: Proceeding of the 12th International Design Conference. Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp: 1941-1950.
    
37. Ryynänen, L. and A. Riitahuhta, 2010. Developing engineering creativity in the early design stages of product development process. DS 66-2: Proceeding of the 1st International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC, 2010).
    
38. Saunders, M.N., C.C. Seepersad and K. Hölttä-Otto, 2009. The characteristics of innovative, mechanical products. Proceeding of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE2009). San Diego, CA, 8: 905-914.
    CrossRef    
39. Shah, J.J., S.M. Smith and N. Vargas-Hernandez, 2003. Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Stud., 24(2): 111-134.
    CrossRef    
40. Shartrand, A.M., R.L. Gomez and P. Weilerstein, 2012. Answering the call for innovation: Three faculty development models to enhance innovation and entrepreneurship education in engineering. Proceeding of the ASEE Annual Conference. San Antonio, Texas.
    
41. Tetris Project, 2007. Retrieved from: http://www.tetris-project.org./index.php?lang=en. (Accessed on: October, 2015).
    Direct Link
42. Ulrich, K.T. and S.D. Eppinger, 2008. Product Design and Development. 4th Edn., McGraw-Hill, New York.
    
43. Zeiler, W., 2010. Thinking outside the box: Integral design and C-K concept creation. DS 66-2: Proceeding of the 1st International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC, 2010).
    
44. Zhang, G.L., F.X. Pei, Z.K. Zhou and J. Yao, 2009. Improved design of sagittal femoral condylar geometry using TRIZ. Proceeding of the 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress. Cairns, Australia, pp: 13-17.
    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.