Abstract

Most of the analysis that has been done on the Reynolds’ equation which forms the basis for journal bearing performance utilized the simplified assumption due to mathematical complexity but this study aims at analyzing the Reynolds’ equation using the full two dimensional form to find out the performance of the journal bearing without the assumption that the pressure gradient in one axis is negligible. This become necessary because machineries in industries rotate at a very high speed, carrying heavy load on the shaft so the shaft, no matter how perfectly aligned they are at assembly, become misaligned when subjected to these heavy loads and the hydrodynamic pressure is skewed towards the position of minimum film thickness. The pressure is distributed in two dimensions. Previous literature often made use of the long bearing approximation with pressure gradient along the axial direction taken as zero. To accurately predict the performance of journal bearings, the axial direction was taken into consideration in this study. Numerical methods were employed to analyze the two dimensional Reynolds’ equation without vertical flow. Finite Element Method (FEM) and the Finite Difference Method (FDM) were used to find the nodal pressure and the nodal load capacity applying the half Sommerfeld’s boundary condition. The maximum pressure obtained for the bearing considered was 0.3891MPa and the maximum load the bearing can support is 8.1507×10³ N/m.

Keywords:

Finite difference, finite element method, journal bearing, load capacity, nodal pressure, pressure distribution,

References

1. Chauhan, A., A. Singla, N. Panwar and P. Jindal, 2014. CFD based thermo-hydrodynamic analysis of circular journal bearing. Int. J. Adv. Mech. Eng., 4(5): 475-482.
   
2. Kwon, Y.W. and H. Bang, 1997. The Finite Element Method Using Matlab. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
   
3. Mane, R.M. and S. Soni, 2013. Analysis of hydrodynamic plain journal bearing. Proceeding of the COMSOL Conference, Bangalore.
   
4. Mishra, P.C., 2014. Analysis of a rough elliptic bore journal bearing using expectancy model of roughness characterization. Tribol. Ind., 36(2): 211-219.
   
5. Mukesh, S., K.G. Ashish, D. Ashish, 2012. Thermohydrodynamic analysis of a journal bearing using CFD as a tool. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 2(9): 1-7.
   
6. Nuruzzaman, D.M., M.K. Khalil, M.A. Chowdhury and M.L. Rahaman, 2010. Study on pressure distribution and load capacity of a journal bearing using finite element method and analytical method. Int. J. Mech. Mech. Eng., 10(5): 1-8.
   
7. Oghenevwaire, O.E. and S. Odi-Owei, 2014. Analysis of the journal bearing performance of a reciprocating compressor using methane. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., 7(16): 3369-3373.
   CrossRef    Direct Link
8. Panday, K.M., P.L. Choudhury and N.P. Kumar, 2012. Numerical unsteady analysis of thin film lubricated journal bearing. IACSIT Int. J. Eng. Technol., 4(2): 185-191.
   CrossRef    Direct Link
9. Stachowiak, G.W. and A.W. Batchelor, 2006. Engineering Tribology. 3rd Edn., Butterworth-Heinemann Publishers, pp: 146-197.
   
10. Stefani, F., 2011. FEM Applied to Hydrodynamic Bearing Design. In: Ghrib, T. (Ed.), New Tribological Ways. InTech, ISBN: 978-953-307-206-7.
    CrossRef    Direct Link
11. Zienkiewicz, O.C. and R.L. Taylor, 2000. The Finite Element Method. 5th Edn., Volume 1-The Basis. Butterworth-Heinemann Publishers, pp: 42-644.
    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.