Home            Contact us            FAQs
    
      Journal Home      |      Aim & Scope     |     Author(s) Information      |      Editorial Board      |      MSP Download Statistics

     Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology


Some Engineering Properties of Four African Date Palm Fruit Cultivars

1Ndubisi A. Aviara, 1Abubakar A. Lawal, 2Lawrence A.O. Ogunjimi and 1Abdu Dauda
1Department of Agricultural and Environmental Resources Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria
2Department of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife, Nigeria
Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology  2014  2:379-387
http://dx.doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.7.265  |  © The Author(s) 2014
Received: April 20, 2013  |  Accepted: May 08, 2013  |  Published: January 10, 2014

Abstract

This investigation was carried out to study some physical, mechanical and thermal properties of four cultivars of African date fruits and kernels namely ‘digila’, ‘krikri’, ‘sukur’ and ‘trigal’. The properties investigated include length, width, pulp thickness, roundness, sphericity, fruit and kernel mass, true density, bulk density and porosity. Others are angle of repose, static coefficient of friction, crushing strength and specific heat. Average fruit and kernel length of digila, krikri, sukur and trigal cultivars at the moisture contents of 17.85, 11.46, 15.85 and 12.27% (d.b.), respectively, was 38.04 and 21.98 mm, 30.70 and 22.99 mm, 33.23 and 22.40 mm and 36.08 and 22.60 mm. Corresponding average width value was 15.53 and 6.35 mm, 14.80 and 6.92 mm, 17.01 and 7.59 mm and 18.00 and 8.26 mm, for fruits and kernels. Roundness of digila, krikri, sukur and trigal fruit and kernel was 46.10 and 28.78%, 37.10 and 36.78%, 44.35 and 33.10% and 44.31 and 35.84%, respectively. Sphericity of fruit and kernel was, respectively 49.64 and 33.52% (digila), 58.81 and 37.40% (krikri), 47.85 and 35.70% (sukur) and 43.25 and 32.13% (trigal). Bulk density of the fruits of the cultivars was found to be relatively lower than that of their corresponding kernels. True density of fruits was lower than the density of water, while kernels were higher. Porosity of the fruits was 34.0, 35.21, 39.0 and 50.5% for digila, krikri, sukur and trigal and the corresponding kernel porosity was 38.8, 59.5, 30.3 and 48.6%, respectively. The angle of repose of fruit and kernel was found to be 19.82 and 34.94o (digila), 18.07 and 33.36o (krikri), 21.93 and 29.0o (sukur) and 25.49 and 20.93o (trigal). The crushing strength of both fruit and kernel was 6.74 and 10.68, 2.03 and 4.35, 13.15 and 17.64 and 5.63 and 9.67 kN/m2, for digila, krikri, sukur and trigal, respectively. Static coefficient of friction of fruit and kernel varied structural surface. Specific heat varied with cultivar and was higher for the kernel than the fruit.

Keywords:

African date palm, crushing strength, digila, krikri, Nigeria, physical properties, specific heat, sukur, trigal,


References

  1. Abdullahi, M.H.R.O., P.E. Ch'ng and T.H. Lim, 2011. Some physical properties of Parkia speciosa seeds. Proceeding of the 6th International Conference on Food Engineering and Biotechnology.
    Direct Link
  2. Ahmadi, H., H. Fathollahzadeh and H. Mobli, 2009. Post harvest physical and mechanical properties of Apricot fruits, pits and kernels (C.V. Sonnati Salmas) cultivated in Iran. Pak. J. Nutr., 8(3): 264-268.
    CrossRef    
  3. Al-Suhaibani, S.A., A.S. Babeir, J. Kilgour and J.C. Flynn, 1988. The design of a date palm service machine. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 40: 143-157.
    CrossRef    
  4. AOAC, 1980. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists Press, Washington, D.C.
  5. Aviara, N.A. and M.A. Haque, 2001. Moisture dependence of thermal properties of sheanut kernel. J. Food Eng., 47: 109-113.
    CrossRef    
  6. Aviara, N.A., M.A. Haque and I.A. Izge, 2000. Physical and frictional properties of sheanut. Agroscience, 1(2): 19-34.
    CrossRef    
  7. Aviara, N.A., E. Mamman and B. Umar, 2005a. Some physical properties of balanites aegyptiaca nuts. Biosyst. Eng., 92(3): 325-334.
    CrossRef    
  8. Aviara, N.A., F.A. Oluwole and M.A. Haque, 2005b. Effect of moisture content on some physical properties of sheanut (Butyrospernum Paradoxum). Int. Agrophys., 19: 193-198.
  9. Aviara, N.A., M.A. Haque and L.A.O. Ogunjimi, 2008. Therma properties of guna seed. Int. Agrophys., 22: 291-297.
  10. Aviara, N.A., M.I. Gwandzang and M.A. Haque, 1999. Physical properties of guna seeds. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 73(2): 105-111.
    CrossRef    
  11. Aviara, N.A., S.E. Ehiabhi, O.O. Ajibola, S.A. Oni, P.P. Power, T. Abbas and O.A. Onuh, 2011. Effect moisture content and temperature on the specific heat of soya bean, moringa oleifera seed and mucuna flagellipes nut. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 4(1): 87-92.
  12. Aviara, N.A., S.K. Shittu and M.A. Haque, 2007. Physical properties of guna fruits relevant in bulk handling and mechanical processing. Int. Agrophysics, 21: 7-16.
  13. Bhatia, T., R.K. Sharma, K.K. Prasad and K. Prasad, 2009. Studies on some properties of protein-rich legume (Lens esculantus) splits. Asian J. Chem., 21(10): 103-107.
  14. Carman, K., 1996. Somephysical properties of Lentil seed. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 63: 87-92.
    CrossRef    
  15. Chandra, A., A. Chandra and I.C. Gupta, 1993. Arid Fruit Research, Chapter 7: Date Palm. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, India.
  16. Dash, A.K., R.C. Pradhan, L.M. Das and S.N. Naik, 2008. Some physical properties of simarouba fruit and kernel. Int. Agrophys., 22: 111-116.
  17. Demir, F. and M. Ozcan, 2001. Chemical and technological properties of rose (Roscanina L.) fruits grown wild in Turkey. J. Food Eng., 47: 333-336.
    CrossRef    
  18. Dutta, S.K., V.K. Nema and R.K. Bhardwaj, 1988a. Physical properties of gram. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 39: 259-268.
    CrossRef    
  19. Dutta, S.K., V.K. Nema and R.K. Bhardwaj, 1988b. Thermal properties of gram. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 39: 269-275.
    CrossRef    
  20. Fo'hat, M., V. Etemad, S.M.T. Gharibzahedi and M. Ghahderijani, 2011. Physical, mechanical and aerodynamic properties of Acorn (Quercus suber L.) as potentials for development of processing machines. Aust. J. Crop Sci., 5(4): 473-378.
  21. Heidarbeigi, K., H. Ahmadi, K. Kheiralipour and A. Tabatabaeefar, 2009. Some physical and mechanical properties of Khinjuk. Pak. J. Nutr., 8(1): 74-77.
    CrossRef    
  22. Ige, M.T., 1977. Measurement of some parameters affecting the handling losses of some varieties of cowpea. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 34: 75-81.
    CrossRef    
  23. Irtwange, S.V. and J.C. Igbeka, 2002. Some physical properties of two African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) accessions and their interrelation with moisture content. Appl. Eng. Agric., 18(5): 567-576.
    CrossRef    
  24. Jain, R.K. and S. Bal, 1997. Physical properties of pearl millet. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 66: 85-91.
    CrossRef    
  25. Joshi, D.C., S.K. Das and R.K. Mukherjee, 1993. Physical properties of pumpkin seeds. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 54(3): 219-229.
    CrossRef    
  26. Kader, A.A. and A.M. Hussein, 2009. Harvesting and post-harvest handling of dates. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, Aleppo, Syria, 15: 15.
  27. Kashaninejad, M., A. Mortazavi, A. Safekordi and L.G. Tabil, 2007. Some physical properties of pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) nut and kernel. J. Food Eng., 72: 30-38.
    CrossRef    
  28. Keramat Jahromi, M., A. Jafari, S. Rafiee, A.R. Keyhani, R. Mirasheh and S.S. Mohtasebi, 2007. Some physical properties of date fruit (cv. Lasht). Agricuitural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal. Manuscript FP 07 019. Vol. 9.
    Direct Link
  29. Lawton, P.J., 1980. Coefficient of friction between cereal grain and various silo wall materials. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 25: 75-86.
    CrossRef    
  30. Maduako, J.N. and M.O. Faborode, 1990. Some physical properties of cocoa pods in relation to primary processing. Ife J. Technol., 2(1): 1-7.
  31. Mahmoudi, H., G. Hosseininia, H. Azadi and M. Fatemi, 2008. Enhancing date palm processing, marketing and pest control through organic culture. J. Organ. Syst., 3(2): 29-39.
  32. Makanjuola, N.N., 1972. A study of some of the physical properties of melon seeds. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 17: 128-137.
    CrossRef    
  33. Mamman, E., B. Umar and N.A. Aviara, 2005. Effect of moisture content and loading orientation on the mechanical properties of Balanites Aegyptiaca nuts. Agric. Eng. Int. CIGR E-J., FP04 015, VII.
    Direct Link
  34. Mohsenin, N.N., 1986. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. 2nd Edn., Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York.
  35. Naderiboldaji, M., A. Khadivi khub, A. Tabatabaeefar, V.M. Ghasemi and Z. Zamani, 2008. Some physical properties of sweet cherry (prunus avium L.) fruit. Am-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci., 3(4): 513-520.
  36. Oje, K., 1994. Moisture dependence of some physical properties of cowpea. Ife J. Technol., 4(2): 23-27.
  37. Osunade, J.A. and F. Lasisi, 1994. Coefficient of friction of maize and sorghum grains on laterized concrete wall. NSE Tech. Transact., 29: 50-57.
  38. Owolarafe, O.K., M.T. Olabige and M.O. Faborode, 2007. Physical and mechanical properties of two varieties of fresh oil palm fruit. J. Food Eng., 78(4): 228-1232.
    CrossRef    
  39. Sormez, N., H.H.A. Alizadeh, R. Ozturk, A.I. Acar and G. Tarihi, 2007. Some physical properties of gilaburu seed. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(3): 308-311.
  40. Suthar, S.H. and S.K. Das, 1996. Some physical properties of karingda [citrullus lanatus (Thumb) Mansf] seeds. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 65: 15-22.
    CrossRef    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.

ISSN (Online):  2040-7467
ISSN (Print):   2040-7459
Submit Manuscript
   Information
   Sales & Services
Home   |  Contact us   |  About us   |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2024. MAXWELL Scientific Publication Corp., All rights reserved