Abstract

The selection of an optimal access network is an essential aspect of service delivery in heterogeneous wireless networks. Many efficient methods are used in the selection of the best network. The relation between monetary cost and bandwidth affects the network selection process, but this consideration is not accounted for in other selection processes. This study proposes the use of golden ratio to determine the mathematical relation between monetary cost and bandwidth, which can serve as a viable indicator for both users and service providers. Results and analyses illustrate the efficiency of the suggested relation to select the best network in heterogeneous wireless networks and optimize user and network provider satisfaction levels.

Keywords:

Golden ratio, heterogeneous wireless networks, network selection, relation between cost and bandwidth,

References

1. Akhtaruzzaman, M. and A.A. Shafie, 2012. Geometrical substantiation of phi, the golden ratio and the baroque of nature, architecture, design and engineering. Int. J. Arts, 1(1): 1-22.
   CrossRef    
2. Bailey, J., L. McKnight and H. Sharifi, 1998. Critical business decisions for internet services. Proceedings of Information Resources Management Association International Conference, Global Information Technology Management Track, pp: 1-23.
   
3. Falbo, C., 2005. The golden ratio:A contrary viewpoint. Coll. Math. J., 36(2): 123-134.
   CrossRef    
4. Kaleem, F., A. Mehbodniya, K.K. Yen and F. Adachi, 2013. A fuzzy preprocessing module for optimizing the access network selection in wireless networks. Adv. Fuzzy Syst., 2013: 1-9.
   CrossRef    
5. Kassar, M., B. Kervella and G. Pujolle, 2008. An overview of vertical handover decision strategies in heterogeneous wireless networks. Comput. Commun., 31: 2607-2620.
   CrossRef    
6. Nikolic, S. and I. Cosic, 2011. The effect of the'golden ratio'on consumer behaviour. Afr. J. Bus. Manage., 5(20): 8347-8360.
   
7. Niyato, D. and E. Hossain, 2009. Dynamics of network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks: An evolutionary game approach. IEEE T. Veh. Technol., 58(4): 2008-2017.
   CrossRef    
8. Ormond, O., G. Miro-Muntean and J. Murphy, 2006. Evaluation of an intelligent utility-based strategy for dynamic wireless network selection. Proceeding of 9th IFIP/IEEE International Conference on Management of Multimedia and Mobile Networks and Services, pp: 158-170.
   CrossRef    
9. Salih, Y.K. and H.S. Ong, 2013. A non-cooperative game selection model based on multiplicative exponent weighting method in heterogeneous wireless networks. Jokull J., 63(7): 1-15.
   
10. Salih, Y.K., O.H. See and S. Yussof, 2012. MIH: State of art and a proposed future direction in the heterogeneous wireless networks. J. Appl. Sci., 12(13): 1318-1331.
    CrossRef    
11. Tawil, R., G. Pujolle and J. Demerjian, 2008. Distributed handoff decision scheme using MIH function for the fourth generation wireless networks. Proceeding of 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications, pp: 1-6.
    CrossRef    
12. Trestian, R., O. Ormond and G.M. Muntean, 2012. Game theory-based network selection: Solutions and challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, 14(4): 1212-1231.
    CrossRef    
13. Wang, L. and G.S. Kuo, 2013. Mathematical modeling for network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks: A tutorial. IEEE Commun. Surve. Tutorials, 15(1): 271-292.
    CrossRef    
14. Wang, Y., P. Zhang, Y. Zhou and J. Yuan, 2008. Handover management in enhanced MIH framework for heterogeneous wireless networks environment. Wireless Pers. Commun., 52(3): 615-636.
    CrossRef    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.