Home            Contact us            FAQs
    
      Journal Home      |      Aim & Scope     |     Author(s) Information      |      Editorial Board      |      MSP Download Statistics

     Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology


Project Duration Risk Transmission and Control based on CCPM

Chen Hong-Yi, Xu Liang and Zhang Chen-Song
School of Economic and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology  2014  3:619-624
http://dx.doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.7.298  |  © The Author(s) 2014
Received: March 08, 2013  |  Accepted: April 12, 2013  |  Published: January 20, 2014

Abstract

This study advances a project duration risk transmission model based on CCPM and the generalized project risk element transmission theory. By combining the calculation of systemic duration risk of a single process and the transmission of duration delay through an activity chain, this study proposes an modified method of calculating and setting input buffer and project buffer and also distinguishes the bottleneck activities on both the critical chain and non-critical chain, this method can offer a more reliable basis for making a project schedule plan and duration risk control.

Keywords:

Bottleneck activities, critical chain project management, duration risk, risk element transmission,


References

  1. Abbasi, G.Y. and A.M. Mukattash, 2001. Crashing PERT networks using mathematical programming [J]. Int. J. Proj. Manag., 19(3): 1812188.
    CrossRef    
  2. Assaf, S.A. and S. Al-Hejji, 2006. Causes of delay in large construction projects [J]. Int. J. Proj. Manag., 24: 349-357.
    CrossRef    
  3. Castro-Lacouture, D., G.A. Süer, J. Gonzalez-Joaqui and J. Yates, 2009. Construction project scheduling with time, cost and material restrictions using fuzzy mathematical models and critical path method [J]. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135(10): 1096-1104.
    CrossRef    
  4. Hong, F., J. Rongyan and W. Xia, 2005. The application of improved PERT on risk analysis in project schedule [J]. Value Eng., 24(8): 121-124.
  5. Kaliba, C., M. Muya and K. Mumba, 2008. Cost escalation and schedule delays in road construction projects in Zambia [J]. Int. J. Proj. Manag., 27(5): 522-531.
    CrossRef    
  6. Luong, D.L. and A. Ohsato, 2008. Fuzzy critical chain method for project scheduling under resource constraints and uncertainty [J]. Int. J. Proj. Manag., 26(6): 688-698.
    CrossRef    
  7. Mario, V., 2012. Project Management With Dynamic Scheduling [M]. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  8. Min, H., L. Fenge and W. Xingwei, 2005. PERT based risk evaluation model for virtual enterprise [J]. J. Northeastern Univ., Nat. Sci., 26(9): 860-863.
  9. Peter, W., G. Morris, K.P. Jeffrey and P.L. Lawrence, 2004. Critical Chain Project Management [M]. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
  10. Shixin, L., S. Jianhai and T. Jainfu, 2003. Critical chain-a new method for project planning and scheduling [J]. Control Decision,18(5): 513-516.
  11. Trietsch, D. and K.R. Baker, 2012. PERT 21: Fitting PERT/CPM for use in the 21st century. Int. J. Proj. Manag., 30(4): 490-502.
    CrossRef    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.

ISSN (Online):  2040-7467
ISSN (Print):   2040-7459
Submit Manuscript
   Information
   Sales & Services
Home   |  Contact us   |  About us   |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2024. MAXWELL Scientific Publication Corp., All rights reserved