Home            Contact us            FAQs
    
      Journal Home      |      Aim & Scope     |     Author(s) Information      |      Editorial Board      |      MSP Download Statistics

     Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology


Audit Quality and Firm Value: A Case of Pakistan

1Talat Afza and 2Mian Sajid Nazir
COMSATS Institute of IT, Lahore, Pakistan
Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology  2014  9:1803-1810
http://dx.doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.7.465  |  © The Author(s) 2014
Received: May 26, 2013  |  Accepted: June 27, 2013  |  Published: March 05, 2014

Abstract

The present study intends to explore the influence of audit committee characteristics on a firm’s financial performance. The corporate governance mechanisms are highly recognized in era of global financial crisis and current economic recession. Audit committee is one of the core mechanisms that ensure good corporate governance in the firms. Yet, very less evidence found on the impact of audit committee and its characteristics on firm’s performance in the context of Pakistani literature. For that reason, four audit committee characteristics were identified namely audit committee size, independence, activity and quality of external audit to study their impact on firm financial performance while using ROA as accounting measure and Tobin’s Q as market measure. The results of panel data showed that two audit committee characteristics namely audit committee size and external audit quality has strong and significant positive impact on ROA and Tobin’s Q. Another two variables namely audit committee independence and AC activity remains insignificant, which is consistent with mostly previous studies carried in different countries. In short, present study provides an insight to all the regulators, policy makers and stakeholders while adopting certain audit committee characteristics in Pakistan; overall firm’s financial performance can be improved. For further research audit committee expertise can be used to determine the improvement in corporate performance by getting data from the company’s management.

Keywords:

Activity, audit committee, external audit quality, independence, ROA, size, tobin,


References

  1. Abbott, L.J., S. Parker and G.F. Peters, 2004. Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Audit. J. Pract. Theory, 23: 69-87.
    CrossRef    
  2. Baxter, P. and J. Cotter, 2009. Audit committees and earnings quality. Account. Financ., 49(2): 267-90.
    CrossRef    
  3. Beasley, M., 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Account. Rev., 71(4): 443-465.
  4. Becker, C.L., M.L. Defond, J. Jiambalvo and K.R. Subramanyam, 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemp. Account. Res., 15(1): 1-24.
    CrossRef    
  5. Bédard, J., S.H. Chtourou and L. Courteau, 2004. The effect of audit committee expertise, independence and activity on aggressive earnings management. Audit. J. Pract. Theory, 23: 13-35.
    CrossRef    
  6. Bhagat, S. and B. Black, 2002. The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. J. Corporat. Law, 27(2): 231-73.
  7. Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC), 1999. Report and Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committees. New York Stock Exchange and National Association of Securities Dealers, New York.
  8. Bradbury, M., Y. Mak and S. Tan, 2006. Board characteristics, audit committee characteristics and abnormal accruals. Pacific Account. Rev., 18(2): 47-68.
    CrossRef    
  9. Brickley, J.A. and C.M. James, 1987. The takeover market, corporate board composition and ownership structure: The case of banking. J. Law Econ., 30: 161-181.
    CrossRef    
  10. Brickley, J.A., J.L. Coles and R.L. Terry, 1994. Outside directors and the adoption of poison pills. J. Financ. Econ., 35: 371-390.
    CrossRef    
  11. Caplan, D., 1999. Internal controls and the detection of management frauds. J. Account. Res., 37(1): 101-117.
    CrossRef    
  12. Chambers, D.C., 2005. Audit committees: Practice, rules and enforcement in UK and China. Corporate Govern., 13: 92-100.
    CrossRef    
  13. Chan, K.C. and J. Li, 2008. Audit committee and firm value: Evidence on outside top executives as expert-independent directors. Corporate Govern., 16(1): 16-31.
    CrossRef    
  14. Davidson, R., J. Goodwin-Stewart and P. Kent, 2005. Internal governance structures and earnings management. Account. Financ., 45(2): 241-268.
    CrossRef    
  15. DeAngelo, L., 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. J. Account. Econ., 3: 297- 322.
    CrossRef    
  16. Felo, A.J., S. Krishnamurthy and S.A. Solieri, 2003. Audit committee characteristics and the perceived quality financial reporting: An empirical analysis. Working Paper Series, Graduate School of Professional Studies, Penn State University, Great Valley, Malvern PA.
  17. Francis, J.R., 2004. What do we know about audit quality? British Account. Rev., 36: 345-68.
    CrossRef    
  18. Francis, J.R., E.L. Maydew and H.C. Sparks, 1999. The role of Big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Audit. J. Pract. Theory, 18(2): 17-34.
    CrossRef    
  19. Haron, H., M. Jantam and G.P. Eow, 2005. Audit committee compliance with KSE listed requirements. Int. J. Audit., 9: 187-200.
    CrossRef    
  20. Hill, C.W.L. and G.R. Jones, 2004. Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
  21. Hossain, M., S.F. Cahan and M.B. Adams, 2000. The investment opportunity set and the voluntary use of outside directors: New Zealand evidence. Account. Bus. Res., 30(4): 263-273.
    CrossRef    
  22. Jeong, S.W. and J. Rho, 2004. Big six auditors and audit quality: The Korean evidence. Int. J. Account., 39: 175-196.
    CrossRef    
  23. Kabir, M.H., D. Sharma, M.A. Islam and A. Salat, 2010. Big 4 auditor affiliation and accruals quality in Bangladesh. Manage. Audit. J., 26(2): 161-181.
    CrossRef    
  24. Kalbers, L.P. and T.J. Fogarty, 1993. Audit committee effectiveness: an empirical investigation of the contribution of power. Audit. J. Pract. Theory, 12(1): 24-49.
  25. Lee, C., S. Rosenstein, N. Rangan and W.N. Davidson, 1992. Board composition and shareholder wealth: The case of management buyouts. Financ. Manage., 21: 58-72.
    CrossRef    
  26. Lin, J.W. and M.I. Wang, 2010. Audit quality, corporate governance and earnings management: A meta-analysis. Int. J. Audit., 14: 55-77.
    CrossRef    
  27. Lin, J.W., J.F. Li and J.S. Yang, 2006. The effect of audit committee performance on earnings quality. Manag. Audit. J., 21(9): 921-933.
    CrossRef    
  28. Menon, K. and J.D. Williams, 1994. The use of audit committees for monitoring. J. Account. Public Policy, 13: 121-139.
    CrossRef    
  29. Millichamp, A.H., 2002. Auditing. 8th Edn., Continuum, London, New York.
    PMid:12170630    
  30. Palmrose, Z., 1988. An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. Account. Rev., 63: 55-73.
  31. Pierce, J. and S. Zahra, 1992. Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. J. Manag. Stud., 29: 411-438.
    CrossRef    
  32. Pincus, K., M. Rusbarsky and J. Wong, 1989. Voluntary formation of corporate audit committees among NASDAQ firms. J. Account. Public Policy, 8(4): 239-265.
    CrossRef    
  33. Public Oversight Board, 1993. In the Public Interest: A Special Report by the Public Oversight Board of the SEC Practice Section. POB, Stamford, CT.
  34. Pucheta-Martinez, M.C. and C.D. Fuentes, 2007. The impact of audit committee Characteristics on enhancement of financial reporting. Corporate Govern. Int. Rev., 15(6): 1394-1412.
    CrossRef    
  35. Qin, B., 2007. The influence of audit committee financial expertise on earnings quality: US evidence. Icfai J. Audit Pract., 4(3): 8-28.
  36. Raghunandan, K. and D.V. Rama, 2007. Determinants of audit committee diligence. Account. Horizons, 21(3): 265-297.
    CrossRef    
  37. Rahman, R.A. and H.M. Ali, 2006. Board, audit committee, culture and earnings management: Malaysian evidence. Manag. Audit. J., 21(7): 783-804.
    CrossRef    
  38. Rahmat, M.M. and T.M. Iskandar, 2009. Audit committee characteristics in financially distressed and non-distressed companies. Manag. Audit. J., 24(7): 624-638.
    CrossRef    
  39. Sommer, A.A., 1991. Auditing audit committees: An educational opportunity for auditors. Account. Horizons, June: 91-93.
  40. Treadway Commission, 1987. Report of the national commission on fraudulent financial reporting. National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting, Geneva.
  41. Vicknair, D., K. Hickman and K.C. Carnes, 1993. A note on audit committee independence. Account. Horizon, 7(1): 53-57.
  42. Xie, B., W.N. Davidson and P.J. DaDalt, 2003. Earnings management and corporate governance: the roles of the board and the audit committee. J. Corp. Financ., 9: 295-314.
    CrossRef    
  43. Yang, J. and J. Krishnan, 2005. Audit committees and quarterly earnings management. Int. J. Audit., 9: 201-19.
    CrossRef    
  44. Yermack, D., 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. J. Financ. Econ., 40: 185-213.
    CrossRef    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.

ISSN (Online):  2040-7467
ISSN (Print):   2040-7459
Submit Manuscript
   Information
   Sales & Services
Home   |  Contact us   |  About us   |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2024. MAXWELL Scientific Publication Corp., All rights reserved