Abstract

In this study, fire in a short 2-lane single-directional road tunnel with two different traffic situations is considered and the impact of spread of fire and smoke on people evacuation is investigated. The FDS+Evac system used comprises of FDS (Fire Dynamics Simulator), an advanced CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) fire field model supplemented by agent-based FDS evacuation model, Evac. Evac is capable to exploit its direct access to simulated fire characteristics and to model the influence of fire on evacuees’ behavior and decision making. In Evac, a modified Helbing’s social force model adapted for description of movement of evacuees and their behavior is implemented. Some particularities of FDS+Evac, which must be taken into account to avoid misrepresentation of inputs for evacuation in case of fire, are discussed and the impact of occurrence of higher capacity vehicles on people evacuation is illustrated. Simulation results and some of comments and recommendations included can be useful for those who are engaged in research, development, testing and competent use of FDS+Evac for practical problems of fire safety in road tunnels.

Keywords:

Agent-based, evacuation modeling, FDS+Evac, fire simulation, road tunnel,

References

1. Atkinson, G.T. and Y. Wu, 1996. Smoke control in sloping tunnels. Fire Safety J., 27: 335-341.
   CrossRef    
2. Bari, S. and J. Naser, 2005. Simulation of smoke from burning vehicle and pollution levels caused by traffic jam in a road tunnel. Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 20(3): 281-290.
   CrossRef    
3. Bebcak, P., 2007. Fire Safety of Buildings (in Czech). Society of Fire and Safety Engineering, Ostrava.
   
4. Betta, V. and F. Cascetta, 2009. Numerical study of the optimization of pitch angle of an alternative jet fan in a longitudinal tunnel ventilation system. Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 24: 164-172.
   CrossRef    
5. Carvel, R.O., A.N. Beard and P.W. Jowitt, 2005. Fire spread between vehicles in tunnels: Effects of tunnel size, longitudinal ventilation and vehicle spacing. Fire Technol., 41: 271-304.
   CrossRef    
6. Carvel, R.O., R. Guillermo and J.L. Torero, 2009. Ventilation and suppression systems in road tunnels: some issues regarding their appropriate use in a fire emergency. Proceedings of the 2nd International Tunnel Safety Forum for Road and Train. Lyon, France, pp: 375-382.
   
7. Forney, G.P., 2009. Smokeview Version 5: A Tool for Visualizing Fire Dynamics Simulator Data. Verification Guide. NIST Special Publication 1017-1C, U.S. Goverment Printing Office, Washington.
   
8. Gao-Shang, Y., P. Li-Min, Z. Jing-Hua and A. Yong-Lin, 2006. Simulation of people's evacuation in tunnel fire. J. Cent. South Univ., T., 13(3): 307-312.
   
9. Glasa, J., L. Valasek, P. Weisenpacher and L. Halada, 2012. Use of PyroSim for simulation of cinema fire. Int. J. Recent Trends Eng. Technol., 7(2): 51-56.
   
10. Glasa, J., L. Valasek, L. Halada and P. Weisenpacher, 2013. Impact of turned cars in tunnel on modeling people evacuation in fire conditions. Proceedings of the 8th IEEE Computer Society EUROSIM Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Cardiff, UK, pp: 84-89.
    
11. Halada, L., P. Weisenpacher and J. Glasa, 2012. Computer Modelling of Automobile Fires. In: Liu, Ch. (Ed.), Advances in Modeling of Fluid Dynamics. In Tech Publisher, Rijeka, pp: 203-228.
    CrossRef    
12. Han, X., B. Cong, X. Li and L. Han, 2013. Effect analysis of fans activating time on smoke control mode for road tunnel fire. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., 5(13): 3571-3575.
    
13. Helbing, D. and P. Molnar, 1995. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Phys. Rev. E, 51(5): 4282-4286.
    CrossRef    PMid:9963139    
14. Helbing, D., I. Farkas and T. Vicsek, 2000. Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature, 407: 487-490.
    CrossRef    PMid:11028994    
15. Hill, K., J. Dreisbach, F. Joglar, B. Najafi, K. McGrattan, R. Peacock and A. Hamins, 2007. Verification and validation of selected fire models for nuclear power plant applications. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, NUREG 1824.
    
16. Hu, L.H. and N.K. Fong, 2007. Modelling fire-induced smoke spread and carbon monoxide transportation in a long channel: Fire dynamics simulator comparisons with measured data. J. Hazard. Mater., 140: 293-298.
    CrossRef    PMid:17049158    
17. Ingason, H. and Y.Z. Li, 2013. Model scale tunnel fire tests with longitudinal ventilation. Fire Safety J., 45: 371-384.
    CrossRef    
18. Ji, J., C.G. Fan and W. Zhong, 2012. Experimental investigation on influence of different transverse fire locations on maximum smoke temperature under the tunnel ceiling. Int. J. Heat Mass Tran., 55(17-18): 4817-4826.
    CrossRef    
19. Kang, K., 2010. Characteristic length scale of critical ventilation velocity in tunnel smoke control. Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 25: 205-211.
    CrossRef    
20. Kazaras, K., K. Kirytopoulos and A. Rentizelas, 2012. Introducing the STAMP method in road tunnel safety assessment. Safety Sci., 50: 1806-1817.
    CrossRef    
21. Korhonen, T. and S. Hostikka, 2009. Fire Dynamics Simulator with evacuation-FDS+Evac, Technical Reference and User's Guide. VTT Working Papers 119, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland.
    
22. Kunsch, J.P., 2002. Simple model for control of fire gases in a ventilated tunnel. Fire Safety J., 37: 67-81.
    CrossRef    
23. Kutilova, K., P. Kucera and R. Meinel, 2013. Factors influencing the movement of people during evacuation (in Czech). Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Fire Safety. Sdruzeni pozarniho a bezpecnostniho inzenyrstvi, Ostrava, Sept. 4-5, pp: 137-140.
    
24. Langston, P.A., R. Masling and B.N. Asmar, 2006. Crowd dynamics discrete element multi-circle model. Safety Sci., 44: 395-417.
    CrossRef    
25. Lewis, A.M., D. Ward, L. Cyra and N. Kourti, 2013. European reference network for critical infrastructure protection. Int. J. Crit. Infr. Prot., 6: 51-60.
    CrossRef    
26. Li, Y.Z., B. Lei and H. Ingason, 2013. Theoretical and experimental study of critical velocity for smoke control in a tunnel cross-passage. Fire Techol., 49: 435-449.
    CrossRef    
27. McDermott, R., K.B. McGrattan, S. Hostikka and J.E. Floyd, 2010. Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 5): Technical Reference Guide. Verification, NIST Special Publication 1018-5, NIST, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
    
28. McGrattan, K. and A. Hamins, 2006. Numerical simulation of the Howard street tunnel fire. Fire Techol., 42: 273-281.
    CrossRef    
29. McGrattan, K., R. McDermott, S. Hostikka and J. Floyd, 2010. Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 5): User's Guide. NIST, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, NIST SP 1019-5.
    
30. Megret, O. and O. Vauquelin, 2000. A model to evaluate tunnel fire characteristics. Fire Safety J., 34: 393-401.
    CrossRef    
31. Murray-Smith, D.J., 2013. Methods for testing and validation of simulation models for engineering applications (Tutorial Keynote). Proceedings of the 8th EUROSIM IEEE Computer Society CPS Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Cardiff, UK, Sept. 10-13, pp: 84-89.
    
32. Purser, D.A., 1995. Toxicity Assessment of Combustion Products. In: SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 2nd Edn., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, pp: 2/28-2/146.
    PMid:8522439    
33. Ronchi, E., P. Colonna and N. Berloco, 2013a. Reviewing Italian fire safety codes for the analysis of road tunnel evacuations: Advantages and limitations of using evacuation models. Safety Sci., 52: 28-36.
    CrossRef    
34. Ronchi, E., P. Colonna, S.M.V. Gwynne and D.A. Purser, 2013b. Representation of the impact of smoke on agent walking speeds in evacuation models. Fire Techol., 49: 411-431.
    CrossRef    
35. Ronchi, E., P. Colonna, J. Capote, D. Alvear, N. Berloco and A. Cuesta, 2012. The evaluation of different evacuation models for assessing road tunnel safety analysis. Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 30: 74-84.
    CrossRef    
36. Tetzner, D., R. Pollak, W. Foit and M. Sippel, 1999. Critical velocity- comparative assessment of test results and CFD simulation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Tunnel Fire and Escape from Tunnels. Lyon, France, May 5-7, pp: 181-190.
    
37. Valasek, L., 2013. The use of PyroSim graphical user interface for FDS simulation of a cinema fire. Int. J. Math. Comput. Simul., 7(3): 258-266.
    
38. Valasek, L. and J. Glasa, 2013. Simulation of the course of evacuation in tunnel fire conditions by FDS+Evac. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Mathematics and Computational Methods in Engineering. Rhodes, July 16-19, pp: 228-295.
    
39. Vauquelin, O. and Y. Wu, 2006. Influence of tunnel width on longitudinal smoke control. Fire Safety J., 41(6): 420-426.
    CrossRef    
40. Vega, M.G. and K.M.A. Diaz, 2008. Numerical 3D simulation of longitudinal ventilation system, memorial tunnel case. Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., 23: 539-551.
    CrossRef    
41. Wang, H., 2013. Study of evacuation model for multi-functional sports stadium in colleges. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., 5(5): 1594-1598.
    
42. Weisenpacher, P., L. Halada and J. Glasa, 2011a. Computer simulation of fire in a tunnel using parallel version of FDS. Proceedings of the 7th Mediterranean Combustion Symposium. Cagliari, Sept. 11-15.
    
43. Weisenpacher, P., J. Glasa and L. Halada, 2012a. Parallel simulation of automobile interior fire and its spread onto other vehicles. Proceedings of the International Congress on Fire Computer Modeling. Santander, Oct. 18-19, pp: 329-338.
    
44. Weisenpacher, P., L. Halada, J. Glasa and V. Sipkova, 2011b. Parallel model of FDS used for a tunnel fire simulation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Numerics. Graz, Oct. 5-8, pp: 96-105.
    
45. Weisenpacher, P., P. Polednak, L. Halada, J. Glasa and L. Valasek, 2012b. Analysis of course of fire by computer simulation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Fire Safety. Valtice, Sept. 5-6.
    
46. Weisenpacher, P., J. Glasa, L. Halada, L. Valasek and M. Dobrucky, 2013. The impact of car park fire on concrete structure: Parallel computation. Proceedings of the Conference on Applications of Structural Fire Engineering. Prague, April 19-20, pp: 340-345.
    
47. Werner, T. and D. Helbing, 2003. The social force pedestrian model applied to real life scenarios. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics. University of Greenwich, London, pp: 17-26.
    PMid:12741139    
48. Yang, H., 2013. Study of fire evacuation in big stadium base on performance. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., 5(15): 3946-3950.
    
49. Zhang, B., 2013. Application of mathematical model of evacuation for large stadium building. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., 5(4): 1432-1440.
    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.