Home            Contact us            FAQs
    
      Journal Home      |      Aim & Scope     |     Author(s) Information      |      Editorial Board      |      MSP Download Statistics

     Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology


Comparative Molecular Mechanistic Modelling of a Tubular Thermal Cracker in Two and Three Dimensions

B.A. Olufemi and O.O. Famuyide
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos, Nigeria
Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology  2014  21:4388-4395
http://dx.doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.7.814  |  © The Author(s) 2014
Received: July 09, 2012  |  Accepted: August 08, 2012  |  Published: June 05, 2014

Abstract

This study aimed at the modelling of a tubular thermal cracker in two and three dimensions using 0.15 kg/h of ethane and 1.5 kg/h of nitrogen in laminar flow using a molecular mechanistic model for ethane cracking, followed by the solution and comparison of the results obtained. This was used to find the effect that spatial development had on the generated profiles. The purpose was achieved by deriving the requisite model equations from mass, energy and momentum balances consisting of nine coupled partial differential equations for each of the spatial considerations and using the finite difference numerical scheme to solve. Throughout the reactor length of 1.20 m and radius of 0.0125 m, the resulting concentration and temperature profiles were predicted. In comparison, the profiles from the two and three dimensional developments showed that even though angular variations are small in the three dimensional approach, they are still present and there consideration could be helpful in the design of tubular thermal crackers.

Keywords:

Finite difference, modelling, partial differential equations, Three Dimensional (3-D), tubular thermal cracker, Two Dimensional (2-D),


References

  1. Behlolav, Z., P. Zamostny T. and Herink, 2003. Chem. Eng. Process., 42(2003): 461-473.
  2. Choudhary, V.R., K.C. Mondal and S.A.R. Mulla, 2006. Non-catalytic pyrolysis of ethane to ethylene in the presence of CO2 with or without limited O2. J. Chem. Sci., 118(3): 261-267.
    CrossRef    
  3. Fagley, J.C., 1992. Simulation of transport in laminar: Tubular reactors and application to ethane pyrolysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 31: 58-69.
    CrossRef    
  4. Froment, F.G. and K.B. Bischoff, 1990. Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design. 2nd Edn., John Wiley and Sons, Canada, pp: 400-496.
  5. Garg, R.K. and V.K. Srivastava, 2001. A Modeling Approach to Thermal Cracking in an Annular Reactor-Quencher. Chemical Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi.
  6. Garg, R.K. and V.K. Srivastava, 2006. Modelling and simulation of a non-isothermal tubular cracker. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn, 39(10): 1057-1064.
    CrossRef    
  7. Garg, R.K., V.V. Krishnan and V.K. Srivastava, 2006. Prediction of concentration and temperature profiles for non-isothermal ethane cracking in a pipe reactor. Korean J. Chem. Eng., 23(4): 531-539.
    CrossRef    
  8. Himmeblau, D.M., 1989. Basic Principles and Calculations in Chemical Engineering. 5th Edn., Prentice Hall, USA, pp: 18-30.
  9. Holman, A., O. Olsvisk and O.A. Rakstad, 1995. Pyrolysis of natural gas: Chemistry and concepts. Fuel Process. Technol., 42: 249-267.
    CrossRef    
  10. Houzelot, J.L. and J. Villermaux, 1977. Mass transfer in annular cylindrical reactors in laminar flow. Chem. Eng. Sci., 32: 1465-1470.
    CrossRef    
  11. Niaei, A., J. Towfighi, S.M. Sadrameli and R. Karimzadeh, 2004. The combined simulation of heat transfer and pyrolysis reactions in industrial cracking furnaces. Appl. Therm. Eng., 24(14-15): 2251-2265.
    CrossRef    
  12. Perry, J.H. and C.H. Chilton, 1997. Chemical Engineers Handbook. 7th Edn., McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, pp: 50-400.
  13. Rutherford, A.B., 1989. Elementary Chemical Reactor Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, U.S.A., pp: 259-320.
  14. Sundaram, K.M. and G.F. Froment, 1979. A comparism of simulation models for empty tubular reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci., 34: 117.
    CrossRef    
  15. Sundaram, K.M. and G.F. Froment, 1980. Two dimensional model for the simulation of tubular reactors for thermal cracking. Chem. Eng. Sci., 35: 364.
    CrossRef    
  16. Walter, J.L., W.W. Bannister, E.T. Moorehouse and R.E. Tapscott, 1988. Anomalously high flammability of low volatility fuels due to anomalously low ignition temperatures. Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Gas Fuel Chem., Prepr., 33(2): 395-402.
  17. Xu, Q., B. Chen and X. He, 2002. A fast simulation algorithm for industrial cracking furnaces. Hydrocarb. Process., 81: 65.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.

ISSN (Online):  2040-7467
ISSN (Print):   2040-7459
Submit Manuscript
   Information
   Sales & Services
Home   |  Contact us   |  About us   |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2024. MAXWELL Scientific Publication Corp., All rights reserved