Abstract

A Geospatial Technology-based Group Analytic Hierarchy Process (GAHP) was carried out to forecast the likely flooded areas based on a total number of five set of criteria/factors believed to be influencing flood generation in the study area. The GAHP is based on two categories of experts (hydrologists and geologists). Priority weights were assigned to each criterion/factor based on Saaty’s 9 point scale of preference by the experts and weights were further normalized through the AHP. The ranking given by the two experts were further integrated into GIS environment to come up with the flood forecasting map for the area. These results were further validated using the known Flood Extent Extraction Model developed based on a Minimum Distance Algorithm embedded in ENVI 4.8 software and the Consistency Ratio (CR). Image overlay was carried out in ArcGIS 9.3 software of the two results with the known Flood Extent Extraction Model developed herein. The ranking given by the hydrologists demonstrated a high degree of correlation compared to what is on the ground.

Keywords:

Flood susceptibility mapping, geospatial technology-based group analytic hierarchy process, remote sensing,

References

1. Adiat, K., M. Nawawi and K. Abdullah, 2012. Assessing the accuracy of GIS-based elementary multi criteria decision analysis as a spatial prediction tool-A case of predicting potential zones of sustainable groundwater resources. J. Hydrol., 440-441: 75-89.
   CrossRef    
2. Ayalew, L., H. Yamagishi and N. Ugawa, 2004. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Landslides, 1: 73-81.
   CrossRef    
3. Calder, I.R., R.L. Hall and K.T. Prasanna, 1993. Hydrological impact of Eucalyptus plantation in India. J. Hydrol., 150(2-4): 635-648.
   CrossRef    
4. Chen, D.C., P.C. Chen, Y.C. Lee, S.U. You and H.C. Jao, 2011. Using an analytic hierarchy process to develop competencies on mould product creativity for vocational college students. World T. Eng. Technol. Educ., 9(1): 54-59.
   
5. Cheng, E.W.L. and H. Li, 2001. Analytic hierarchy process: An approach to determine measures for business performance. Meas. Bus. Excellence, 5(3): 30-37.
   CrossRef    
6. Cosgrave, J., 1996. Decision making in emergencies. Disaster Prev. Manage., 5(4): 28-35.
   CrossRef    
7. Coyle, G., 2004. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Practical Strategy: Open Access Material on Internet. Pearson Education Ltd.
   
8. Dai, F.C., C.F. Lee and X.H. Zhang, 2001b. Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ. Geol., 61: 257-271.
   CrossRef    
9. Dano, U.L., A.N. Matori and A.L. Balogun, 2011. A geographic information system and multi-criteria decision analysis in proposing new recreational park sites in universiti teknologi Malaysia. Mod. Appl. Sci., 5(3): 39.
   
10. Drobne, S. and A. Lisec, 2009. Multi-attribute decision analysis in GIS: Weighted linear combination and ordered weighted averaging. Nature, 4(26): 28.
    
11. Eastman, J.R., 1996. Multi-criteria Evaluation and Geographical Information Systems. In: Longley PA, M.F. Goodchild, D.J. Magurie and D.W. Rhind, (Eds.), 2nd Edn., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1: 493-502.
    
12. European Commission, 1995. Soil Terrain Database: Land Management and Natural Hazards Unit. IES and JRC, European Commission, Brussels. (Accessed on: March 30, 2011)
    Direct Link
13. Komac, M., 2006. A landslide susceptibility model using the analytical hierarchy process method and multivariate statistics in perialpine Slovenia. Geomorphology, 74(1-4): 17-28.
    CrossRef    
14. Laemlaksakul, V. and S. Bangsarantrip, 2008. Analytic hierarchy process for design selection of laminated bamboo chair. Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists. Hong Kong, pp: 19-21.
    
15. Levy, J.K. and K. Taji, 2007. Group decision support for hazards planning and emergency management: A Group Analytic Network Process (GANP) approach. Math. Comput. Model., 46(7): 906-917.
    CrossRef    
16. Maier, N.R.F., 1963. Problem-solving Discussions and Conferences: Leadership Methods and Skills. McGraw-Hill, New York.
    
17. Malczewski, J., 1999. GIS and Multi Criteria Decision Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., United States of America, pp: 177-192.
    
18. Meyer, V., S. Scheuer and D. Haase, 2009. A multi criteria approach for flood risk mapping exemplified at the Mulde river, Germany. Nat. Hazards, 48: 17-39.
    CrossRef    
19. Modarres, M., S. Sadi-Nezhad and F. Arabi, 2010. Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process using preference ratio: A case study for selecting management short course in a business school. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput., 1(2): 173-184.
    CrossRef    
20. Navalgund, R.R., 1997. Revised development plan of Ahmedabad urban development authority area-2011. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority and Space Applications Centre, Ahmedabad, India, Technical, Report 1 SAC/RSAG/TR/12/AUG/1997:142.
    
21. Necsoiu, D.M., 2000. A data fusion framework for floodplain analysis using GIS and remotely sensed data. Ph.D. Thesis, University of North Texas Denton, TX, USA.
    
22. Obled, C., J. Wendling and K. Beven, 1994. The sensitivity of hydrological models to spatial rainfall patterns: An evaluation using observed data. J. Hydrol., 159(1): 305-333.
    CrossRef    
23. Ogden, F.L. and P.Y. Julien, 1993. Runoff sensitivity to temporal and spatial rainfall variability at runoff plane and small basin scales. Water Resour. Res., 29(8): 2589-2598.
    CrossRef    
24. Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-hill, New York.
    
25. Saaty, T.L., 1994. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
    
26. Saaty, T.L. and G. Hu, 1998. Ranking by eigenvector versus other methods in the analytic hierarchy process. Appl. Math. Lett., 11(4): 121-125.
    CrossRef    
27. Simon, H., 1977. The New Science of Management Decision. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
    
28. Sinha, R., G. Bapalu, L. Singh and B. Rath, 2008. Flood risk analysis in the Kosi river basin, north Bihar using multi-parametric approach of analytical hierarchy process (AHP). J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens., 36: 335-349.
    CrossRef    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.