Abstract

In the last few decades, much focus has been placed on enhancing oil recovery from existing fields. This is accomplished by the study and application of various methods. As for recent cases, the Study of fluid mobility control and sweep efficiency in gas injection process as well as Water Alternating Gas (WAG) method have demonstrated positive results on oil recovery and thus gained wide interest in petroleum industry. WAG injection application results in an increased oil recovery. Its mechanism consists in reduction of Gas Oil Ratio (GOR). However, there are some problems associated with this which includes poor volumetric sweep efficiency due to its low density and high mobility when compared with oil. This has led to the introduction of Foam Assisted Water Alternating Gas (FAWAG) technique, which in contrast with WAG injection, acts in improving the sweep efficiency and reducing the gas oil ration therefore maximizing the production rate from the producer wells. This study presents a comprehensive review of FAWAG process from perspective of Snorre field experience. In addition some comparative results between FAWAG and the other EOR methods are presented including their setbacks. The main aim is to provide a solid background for future laboratory research and successful field application-extend.

Keywords:

GOR, mobility ratio, sweep efficiency, WAG,

References

1. Aarra, M.G., A. Skauge and H.A. Martinsen, 2002. FAWAG: A breakthrough for EOR in the North Sea. Proceeding of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. San Antorio, Texas.
   CrossRef    
2. Alex, T.T. and K.S. Ashok, 1998. Field foam applications in enhanced oil projects: Screening and design aspects. Proceeding of the SPE International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition. Beijing, China.
   PMCid:PMC22741    
3. Awan, A.R., R.A. Teigland and J. Kleppe, 2006. EOR survey in the North Sea. Proceeding of the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improve Oil Recovery. HELD in Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
   
4. Blaker, T., M.G. Aarra, A. Skauge and L. Rasmussen, 1999. Foam for gas mobility control in the Snorre field: The FAWAG project. SPEREE, 5(4): 317-323, SPE-78824-PA, DOI: 10.2118/78824-PA.
   CrossRef    
5. Connor, P. and R.H. Ottewill, 1971. The adsorption of cationic surface agents on polystyrene surfaces. J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 37(3): 642-651.
   CrossRef    
6. Corkill, J.M., J.F. Goodman and J.R. Tate, 1966. Adsorption of non-ionic surface-active agents at graphon/solution interface. Trans. Faraday Soc., 62: 979-986.
   CrossRef    
7. Craig, F.F., 1971. Reservoir Engineering Aspects of Waterflooding Ingection. Society of Petroleum Engineers Monograph Series, Richardson, TX, Vol. 3.
   
8. Crogh, N.A., K. Eide and S.E. Morterud, 2002. WAG injection at the statfjord field, a success story. Proceeding of the European Petroleum Conference, Aberdeen.
   CrossRef    
9. Duerksen, J.H., 1986. Laboratory study of foaming surfactants as steam diverting agents. Soc. Pet. Eng. Res. Eng., January, pp: 44-52.
   
10. Dullien, F.A.L., I. Chatzis and A. Kantzas, 1989. Laboratory studies of macroscopic and microscopic mechanisms of immiscible gas drive-gravity drainage recovery. Proceeding of the 3rd International Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery. Maracaibo, Venezuela, 1: 424-437.
    
11. Falls, A.H. and G.J. Hirasaki, 1988. Development of a mechanistic foam simulator: The population balance and generation by snap-off. SPE Reservoir Eng., 3: 884-892.
    CrossRef    
12. Gauglitz, P.A., F. Friedmann, S.I. Kam and W.R. Rossen, 2002. Foam generation in homogeneous porous media. J. Chem. Eng. Sci., 57(19): 4037-4052.
    CrossRef    
13. Glover, C.J., M.C. Puerto, J.M. Maerker and E.L. Sandvik, 1979. Surfactant phase behavior and retention in porous media. SPE J., 19: 183-193.
    CrossRef    
14. Hanssen, J.E., T. Holt and L.M. Surgiichev, 1994. Foam processes: An assessment of their potential in North Sea reservoirs based on a critical evaluation of current field experience. Proceeding of the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa.
    CrossRef    
15. Hanssen, J.E., T. Holt and L.M. Surguchev, 1996. Foam application in North Sea reservoirs, I: Design and technical support of field trials. Proceeding of the 10th Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery. Rogaland Research, SPE 35371.
    
16. Haugen, A., M.A. Ferno, A. Graue and H.J. Bertin, 2010. Experimental study of foam flow in fractured oil-wet limestone for enhanced oil recovery. Proceeding of the SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium. Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, pp: 24-28.
    CrossRef    
17. Hirasaki, G.J. and J.B. Lawson, 1985. Mechanisms of foam flow in porous media: Apparent viscosity in smooth capillaries. SPE J., 25(2): 176-190.
    CrossRef    
18. Hoefner, M.L., E.M. Evans, J.J. Buckles and T.A. Jones, 1994. C02 foam: Results from four developmental field trials. Proceeding of the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa.
    
19. Kharrat, R., S. Mahdavi and D. Ghorbani, 2012. A comprehensive EOR study of a highly fractured matured field-case study. Proceeding of the EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition Incorporating SPE Europec. Copenhagen, Denmark.
    CrossRef    
20. Kovscek, A.R. and C.J. Radke, 1994. Fundamentals of Foam Transport in Porous Media. In: Schramm, L.L. (Ed.), Foams: Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry. ACS Advances in Chemistry Series No. 242, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 242: 115-163.
    CrossRef    
21. Kovscek, A.R.T., D.C. Tretheway and C.J. Radke, 1995. Foam flow through a transparent rough-walled rock fracture. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng., 13: 75-86.
    CrossRef    
22. Krause, R.E., R.H. Lane, D.L. Kuehne and G.F. Bain, 1992. Foam treatment of producing wells to increase oil production at pnidhoe bay. Proceeding of the SPE/DOE Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery, Tulsa.
    CrossRef    
23. Kristiansen, T.S. and H. Torleif, 1992. Properties of flowing foam in porous media containing oil. Proceeding of the 8ht Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery. Held in Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
    CrossRef    Direct Link
24. Lake, L.W., 1989. Enhanced Oil Recovery. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff, New Jersey.
    
25. Li, B., G.J. Hirasaki and C.A. Miller, 2006. Upscaling of foam mobility control to three dimensions. Proceeding of the SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery. Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
    CrossRef    
26. McPhee, C.A., A.D.H. Tehrani and R.P.S. Jolly, 1988. Foam flooding of core under noeth sea reservoir conditions. Proceeding of the SPE/DOE Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery. Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
    
27. Ransohoff, T.C. and C.J. Radke, 1988. Mechanisms of foam generation in glass-bead packs. SPE Reservoir Eng., 3(2): 573-585.
    CrossRef    
28. Roof, J.G., 1970. Snap-off of oil droplets in water-wet pores. J. Soc. Petrol. Eng., 10(1): 85-90.
    CrossRef    
29. Schramm, L.L. and F. Wassmuth, 1994. Foams: Basic Principles. In: Schramm, L.L. (Ed.), Foams: Fundamentals and Application in the Petroleum Industry. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, USA.
    CrossRef    
30. Schramm, L.L. and S.M. Kutay, 2000. Structure/ performance relationships for surfactant stabilized foams in porous media. Proceeding of the Petroleum Society's Canadian International Petroleum Conference. Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
    CrossRef    
31. Shan, D. and W.R. Rossen, 2004. Optimal injection strategies for foam IOR. SPE J., 9: 132-150.
    CrossRef    
32. Shehadeh, K., L.W. Masalmeh and C.P.A. Blom, 2011. Mobility control for gas injection in heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs: Comparison of foams versus polymers. Proceeding of the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference. Manama, Bahrain.
    
33. Skauge, A., M.G. Aarra, L. Surguchcv, H.A. Martinson and L. Rasumussen, 2002. Foam-assisted WAG: Experience from the snorre field. Proceeding of the SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa.
    CrossRef    PMid:12413487    
34. Spirov, P., S.N. Rudyk and A.K. Arif, 2012. Foam assisted WAG, snorre revisit with new foam screening model. Proceeding of the North Africa Technical Conference and Exhibition. Cairo, Egypt.
    CrossRef    
35. Suffridge, F.E., K.T. Raterman and K.T. Russell, 1989. Foam performance under reservoir conditions. Proceeding of the 16th Annual Technecual Conference and Exhibition of SPE, San Antonio.
    CrossRef    
36. SvorstØl, I., 1997. A production well foam pilot in the north sea snorre field: Application of foam to control premature gas break-through. Proceeding of the European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, The Hague.
    
37. SvorstØl, I., 2006. Summary of the snorre foam history. Proceeding of the Force Workshop on Foam, NPD, Statoil, Stavanger.
    
38. Tunio, S.Q., T.A. Chandio and M.K. Memon, 2012. Comparative study of FA WAG and SWAG as an effective EOR technique for a Malaysian field. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., 4(6): 645-648.
    
39. Willhite, P.G. and D.W. Green, 1998. Enhanced Oil Recovery. SPE Dallas, TX.
    
40. Zhu, T., D.O. Ogbe and S. Khataniar, 2004. Improving the foam performance for mobility control and improved sweep efficiency in gas flooding. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43: 4413-4421.
    CrossRef    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.