Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology

Comparative Study on Antioxidant Activity and Cytotoxicity of Defatted Kernels of Mango (Mangifera indica) and Wild Mango (Irvingia gabonensis and Irvingia wombolu)

Abstract

Defatted kernel powder of mango (Mangifera indica) and wild mango (Irvingia gabonensis and Irvingia wombolu) were analysed for their in-vitro antioxidant activity and cytotoxicity. Dry matter content of the three kernel types were in the range of 93 to 95%. On defatting, the percentage oil yield of the Irvingia varieties were similar and 200% higher than that of Mangifera indica. The antioxidant activity using 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) technique showed that the two Irvingia varieties (DIGK and DIWK) had similar IC50 (p>0.05) but significantly higher than that of Mangifera indica kernel (DMIK) (p<0.05). Likewise, results from the Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) technique and Cytotoxicity assay confirmed the higher potency of DMIK over the Irvingia kernels.

Keywords:


Introduction

Conventional mango (Mangifera indica) is a tropical fruit-bearing plants which flourishes better in Africa and Asia. Similar to many edible fruits, the pulp of the fruit is highly commercialised in form of several processed products (Arogba, 1997). The fruit is among several recommended fruits with medicinal importance. It is used in curing beriberi, wrestle heart burn, bronchial diseases, brain fatigue, mental depression and insomnia (Legesse and Emire, 2012). The kernel possesses relatively high phenolic content with effective antioxidant activity. It contains tocopherols and stigmasterol (Bandyopadhyay et al., 2014). Due to the non-edible nature of the raw kernel, its application as antimicrobial or neutraceutical could be influenced by various methods of processing. Residual levels of phenolic compounds could serve as antioxidants (Arogba, 2015).

Another plant growing in wild tropical forests of family Irvingiaceae, is popularly called wild mango (Irvingia), African mango, bush mango, dika or ogbono. Two varieties of the Irvingia species are found in this region; the Irvingia gabonensis which has an edible yellowish pulp when ripe and the Irvingia wombolu with bitter inedible pulp (Anegbeh et al., 2003; Asaah et al., 2003). Methanolic extracts of Irvingia gabonensis kernel are used in the treatment of fungal and bacterial infections, similar to some other medicinal plants. However, their kernel powder have culinary significance as soup-thickener (Matsinkou et al., 2012; Arogba, 2014).

Antioxidants are compounds that can inhibit free radical reactions and restrain oxidative stress to components of cells. The word "antioxidant" is mostly used to describe natural chemicals substances found in foods and living organisms which have beneficial health effects or industrial chemicals which are capable of inhibiting oxidation (Brewer, 2011). Antioxidants in living systems have the ability to stabilize or deactivate free radicals, hence controlling their formation (Aluyor and Ori-Jesu, 2008). Natural antioxidants in foods have thus attracted considerable interest due to their safety, nutritional and therapeutic values. Consequently, phenolic antioxidants in many fruits, spices, vegetables, cereals and herbs have been examined (Pourreza, 2013; Bandyopadhyay et al., 2014).

Over the years, several studies have been conducted on undefatted mango (Mangifera indica) and wild mango (Irvingia gabonensis and Irvingia wombolu) kernels, their testa and extracted oil (Alhassan and Arogba, 2018; Irondi et al., 2018; Kuyooro et al., 2017; Arogba et al., 2016; Arogba and Matanmisi, 2014; Arogba and Omede, 2012). However, there is dearth of information on the defatted residue of these kernels. Hence, further evaluation of the antioxidant activity and cytotoxicity of the defatted kernels in a comparative study is essential.


Materials And Methods

Sample collection and preparation: Ripe mango (Mangifera indica) fruits were plucked directly from trees at Anyigba town, Kogi State. The seeds were dissected using stainless steel knife to obtain the testa and kernel, dried at ambient temperature (28 ± 2°C) and pulverized using mortar and pestle into powdery form. Dry wild mango (Irvingia gabonensis and Irvingia wombolu) kernels were procured separately from Anyigba market, Kogi State. The kernels were sorted manually for wholesomeness. Like the mango kernels, they were pulverized into powdery form.

Dry matter determination: Each sample type was weighed into dish and dried in an air-oven at 105°C to a constant weight and the percentage dry matter was calculated.

Fat extraction: Each sample type [10% (w/v)] in petroleum ether (60° to 80° grade), in triplicate, were placed in a beaker. The mixture was kept at ambient temperature of 28±2°C and shaken periodically for 24 h. The defatted kernels were oven-dried to constant weights and stored in glass-stoppered bottles prior to analysis. The percentage oil yield was calculated. To assess efficiency of the extraction, residual oil in the defatted samples were determined using Soxhlet extraction technique as described by Williams (2007).

Antioxidant assay using DPPH: The free radical 2, 2-Diphenyl-1-Picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) was used as described by Arogba and Omede (2012).

Preparation of samples: For each sample type, 1 g was weighed into a beaker containing 50 mL of methanol and placed on orbital shaker and shaken for 2 h. The supernatant was carefully decanted to form the stock solution from which serial dilutions were made.

One mL of 0.3 mM DPPH in methanol was added to one ml of different concentrations (2000, 1000, 500, 250, 125 and 62.5 μg/mL) of the extract or reference compounds, (Quercetin and Vitamin C). The mixture was vortexed and then incubated in a dark chamber for 30 min after which the absorbance was measured at 517 nm against a control containing 2 mL of methanol:

The percentage inhibition = Absorbance of control-Absorbance of sample/Absorbance of control X 100

The percentage inhibition was plotted against the Log concentration of the extracts (μg/mL) to determine the IC50, as Log-1x (μg/mL) from the equation: y = mx + c when y = 50.

Antioxidant assay using FRAP method: Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) method as described by Benzie and Strain (1999) was modified and employed.

The sample solution was prepared by dissolving 100 mg of each sample type in 20 mL ethanol from which 1 mL was mixed with 1ml FRAP reagent [10:1:1 ratio of acetate buffer 300 mM pH 3.6 : TPTZ (2,4,6,-tripyridyl-s-triazine) 10 mM in 40 mM HCl : 20mM FeCl3.6H2O]. The absorbance (593 nm) was taken at 0 min and then placed in the water bath at 37°C and absorbance was again taken after 4 min. Reference sample of Vitamin C was prepared in the same manner.

Given a FRAP value of 2.0 (equivalent to 28.39 mM), FRAP value of sample = (Change in sample absorbance/Change in Reference absorbance) x 2.0

Cytotoxicity bioassay using brine shrimp larvae: This was conducted using hatched brine shrimp (Artemia salina) larvae as described by Arogba (2014).

Hatching brine shrimp: Equivalent sea water was prepared by dissolving 32 g of NaCl in 1000 mL of distilled water. Some 50 mg of brine shrimp eggs was added to 300 mL of the artificial sea water and incubated under bright light, connected to an air-voltage pump that aerated the mixture. It was sealed and kept for 24 h to hatch.

Preparation of sample extracts: For each sample type, 1 g was dissolved in 50 mL of distilled water to form the stock solution from which serial dilutions were made.

After incubation, 10 brine shrimp larvae were counted and transferred to different vials using a Pasteur pipette and volume was made up to 5 mL with the artificial sea water. Constant volume of 500 μL of each varied concentrations (2000, 1000, 500, 250 and 125 μg/mL) of a sample type or the reference potassium dichromate was added to the vials containing the shrimps. After 24 h, the dead larvae were counted for the determination of the percentage lethality. The lethality endpoint of this bioassay is defined as the absence of controlled forward motion during 30 sec of observation.

The percentage lethality of the shrimp for each concentration was calculated as:

%Lethality = (Number of dead shrimp/Number of surviving shrimp in control) x 100

The LC50 of the sample’s extract was determined from linear regression curve of Percentage lethality against Log (concentration) as described by Asomugha et al. (2015).

Statistical analysis: The statistical analysis was conducted using SEM software available at miniwebtool.com. Results were expressed as mean ± Standard Error of Mean (SEM). Separation of mean was conducted for test of significance at (p = 0.05).


Results And Discussion

Dry matter and oil yield: The percentage dry matter content of the three test samples (Table 1) were comparable, within the range of 93.5-94.7%. These values were similar to those reported by Arogba and Omede (2012) and Arogba (2014). The high dry matter content of these test samples showed that the kernels were properly dried and would not easily promote mould growth or early sprouting.

On defatting, the oil yield of 22% from Mangifera indica kernel in this study was similar to that reported by Arogba (2015) as the variety was obtained from the same locality. The oil yields from Irvingia gabonensis and Irvingia wombolu kernels were also similar and agree with report of Bamidele et al. (2015). However, those of Irvingia varieties were 200% higher than that of Mangifera indica kernel and describing the former as oil-seeds.

The low residual oil yields from the three test samples using Soxhlet extraction technique implied that the cold extraction technique at ambient temperature range of 26-30°C for 24 h was adequate for optimal oil extraction in large-scale experiments.

Antioxidant activity assay: Antioxidants are crucial in preventing degenerative diseases that result from oxidative stress. In living organisms, complex natural substances (glutathione, vitamins C and E) and enzymes (superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, catalase) and foods of plant origin provide total antioxidant capacity for the system (Arogba, 2014).

From the DPPH result in Table 2, the two Irvingia kernels varieties (DIGK and DIWK) had the relatively similar IC50 (p>0.05) but higher than that of DMIK. Mangifera indica kernel (DMIK) possessed relatively higher antioxidant activity than Irvingia kernels and was attributed to the high phenolic content of Mangifera indica kernel (Arogba, 2014; Bandyopadhyay et al., 2014). The tannin constituents of Mangifera indica kernel were identified and quantified in a previous report (Arogba, 2000).

The values of IC50 for DMIK and DIGK in this study were higher than those studied without defatting by Arogba and Omede (2012) and Arogba (2015). The defatting process therefore, had depleted the fat soluble polyphenolic component of the kernels. This could account for lower antioxidant activity of the test samples compared with the reference Quercetin and Vitamin C.

The FRAP results in Table 3 were comparable with those obtained by DPPH technique. Irvingia kernel samples (DIGK and DIWK) had similar FRAP values but differed significantly from DMIK (p<0.05), confirming the high potency of DMIK over the Irvingia kernels. The FRAP value of DMIK in this study supports the similar work of Arogba (2015). Furthermore, the study has shown that the test samples could be used to provide higher levels of natural antioxidants to reduce the risk of oxidative stress, if undefatted.

Cytotoxicity assay: Brine Shrimp larvae are considered as suitable samples for preliminary cytotoxicity assay in pharmacology (Quazi et al., 2017; Montanher et al., 2002). In Table 4, the reference Potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) gave 100% lethality at 2000 µg/mL while test samples gave between 73-80%. This indicated that the test samples were less toxic than the reference sample. The observation was supported by the LC50 of 285 µg/mL for the reference and 458-553 µg/mL of the test samples. Among the test samples, DMIK had relatively higher toxicity than the DIGK or DIWK (p<0.05). This observation implied that the Irvingia kernel varieties (DIGK and DIWK) are safer for consumption than the Mangifera indica kernel (DMIK). If defatting is combined with other treatments such as blanching, the kernel sample could be as safe.

Table 1: Percentage dry matter, oil yield and residual oil content of the kernel samples
Samples Dry matter (%) Oil yield (%) Residual oil (%)
Mangifera indica 93.5±0.55 21.9±1.68 0.9±0.19
Irvingia gabonensis 94.7±1.60 68.3±2.20 2.5±0.39
Irvingia wombolu 94.4±1.62 65.7±2.14 3.1±0.29
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3); the two Irvingia kernels had higher oil and residual oil content than Mangifera indica
Table 2: Percentage inhibition of DPPH in different concentrations of defatted kernel samples
Conc. (μg/mL) DMIK (%) DIGK (%) DIWK (%) Quercetin (%) Vitamin C (%)
2000 88.8±2.17 82.6±1.88 84.6±2.66 95.2±0.97 92.8±1.97
1000 75.5±1.85 72.6±2.17 74.9±1.99 86.5±1.73 84.5±1.20
500 67.9±0.42 65.2±2.23 66.7±0.27 81.1 ±1.99 76.1±0.82
250 59.2±2.23 50.9±2.82 51.0±2.35 74.5±2.24 63.0±2.05
125 45.6±0.98 41.2±0.85 41.6±1.97 60.8±1.48 47.0±1.31
62.5 29.1±1.85 25.3±1.65 28.5±2.17 31.1±0.95 30.0±1.11
IC50 181.4c 241.3d 219.3d 97.9a 150.7b
SEM 25.38
Percentage inhibition. Values are expressed as mean±SEM (n = 3); Values with the same superscripts on the same row are not significantly different at p>0.05; 1: DMIK = Defatted Mangifera indica kernel; 2: DIGK = Defatted Irvingia gabonensis kernel; 3: DIWK = Defatted Irvingia wombolu kernel; 4. SEM = standard error of mean; The IC50 for each sample were obtained from the following equations (y = 50); 1: DMIK: y = 37.8x-35.373, R2 = 0.9833; 2: DIGK: y = 37.619x-39.629, R2 = 0.9885; 3:DIWK: y = 37.724x-38.312, R2 = 0.9931; 4: Quercetin: y = 38.495x-26.63, R2 = 0.8859; 5: Vitamin C: y = 41.867x-41.193, R2 = 0.9764; Decreasing order of IC50 observed was DIGK ≡ DIWK > DMIK > Vitamin C > Quercetin
Table 3: Antioxidant activity of the defatted kernel samples using FRAP method
Sample type FRAP value (Vitamin C equivalent in mM)
DMIK 2.73±0.05d 38.81±0.74d
DIGK 1.78±0.02a 25.19±0.33a
DIWK 1.93±0.04ab 27.40±0.47ab
Vitamin C 2.00±0.00bc 28.39±0.00bc
SEM 0.21 3.03
Values are expressed as mean±SEM (n = 3). Values with the same superscripts on the same column are not significantly different at p>0.05; 1: DMIK = Defatted Mangifera indica kernel; 2: DIGK = Defatted Irvingia gabonensis kernel; 3: DIWK = Defatted Irvingia wombolu kernel; 4: SEM = standard error of mean; DMIK had higher potency compared with the Irvingia kernel samples (DIGK and DIWK)
Table 4: Brine shrimp lethality assay of defatted kernel samples
Conc. (μg/mL) DMIK (%) DIGK (%) DIWK (%) K2Cr2O7 (%)
2000 80.0 73.3 76.7 100
1000 66.7 63.3 63.3 90.0
500 56.7 53.3 50.0 70.0
250 40.0 33.3 36.7 60.0
125 16.7 16.7 20.0 13.3
LC50 457.6b 552.5c 517.7c 284.6a
SEM 59.49
Percentage inhibition. Values with the same superscripts on the same row are not significantly different at p>0.05. Values are expressed as mean (n = 3); 1: DMIK = Defatted Mangifera indica kernel; 2: DIGK = Defatted Irvingia gabonensis kernel; 3: DIWK = Defatted Irvingia wombolu kernel; 4: SEM = standard error of mean; The LC50 for each sample was obtained from the following equations (y = 50): DMIK: y = 41.867x - 41.193, R2 = 0.9764; DIGK: y = 47.733x - 80.9, R2 = 0.9774; DIWK: y = 46.667x - 76.66, R2 = 0.9977; K2Cr2O7: y = 67.8x - 116.4, R2 = 0.9074; Decreasing order of LC50 between the test samples were DIGK ≡ DIWK>DMIK

Conclusion

This study has shown that defatting process removed 96% of the oil content of the Irvingia and Mangifera kernels along with fat-soluble polyphenolic substances. The effect of the latter caused the relatively lower antioxidant activity of Irvingia kernel samples than Mangifera indica sample, which also exhibited relatively higher toxicity on Brine shrimp larvae.


Author Details

1Department of Biochemistry, Kogi State University, PMB 1008, Anyigba, Kogi State, Nigeria


References

Alhassan, A. and S.S. Arogba, 2018. Wild mango (Irvingia wombolu) kernel: Proximate composition, mineral content and haematological profile of wistar albino rat. Int. J. Innov. Res. Develop., 3(7): 222-226.
Aluyor, E.O. and M. Ori-Jesu, 2008. The use of antioxidants in vegetable oils – A review. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 7(25): 4836-4842.
Anegbeh, P.O., C. Usoro, V. Ukafor, Z. Tchoundjeu, R.R.B. Leakey and K. Schreckenberg, 2003. Domestication of Irvingia gabonensis: 3. Phenotypic variation of fruits and kernels in a Nigerian village. Agroforest. Syst., 58(3): 213-218.
Arogba, S.S., 1997. Physical, chemical and functional properties of Nigerian mango (Mangifera indica) kernel and its processed flour. J. Sci. Food Agr., 73(3): 321-328.
Arogba, S.S., 2000. Mango (Mangifera indica) kernel: Chromatographic analysis of the tannin, and stability study of the associated polyphenol oxidase activity. J. Food Compos. Anal., 13(2): 149-156.
Arogba, S.S., 2014. Phenolics, antiradical assay and cytotoxicity of processed mango (Mangifera indica) and bush mango (Irvingia gabonensis) kernels. Nigerian Food J., 32(1): 62-72.
Arogba, S.S., 2015. Effect of processing on antioxidant activity of conventional mango (Mangifera indica) seed. J. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. Food Technol., 9(4): 50-55.
Arogba, S.S. and A. Omede, 2012. Comparative antioxidant activity of processed mango (Mangifera indica) and bush mango (Irvingia gabonensis) kernels. Nigerian Food J., 30(2): 17-21.
Arogba, S.S. and J.A. Matanmisi, 2014. Proximate biological value and protein efficiency ratio of processed bush mango (Irvingia gabonensis) kernel. J. Pharm. Biol. Sci., 2(9): 18-20.
Arogba, S.S., J.S. Itemuagbor, O.A. Medayedupin, Y. Ekeyi and E.O. Alikali, 2016. in-vitro digestibility profile of wild mango (Irvingia spp.) kernel and wheat (Triticum spp.) grain. Nigerian J. Biochem. Molecul. Biol., 31(1-2): 15-23.
Asaah, E.K., Z. Tchoundjeu and A.R. Atangana, 2003. Cultivation and conservation status of Irvingia wombolu in humid lowland forest of Cameroon. Food, Agri. Environ., 1(3-4): 251-256.
Asomugha, R.N., A.N. Ezejiofor, P.N. Okafor and I.I. Ijeh, 2015. Acute and cytotoxicity studies of aqueous and ethanolic leaf extracts of Chromolaena odorata. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 18(1): 46-49.
Bamidele, O.P., O.S. Ojedokun and B.M. Fashogbon, 2015. Physico-chemical properties of Instant ogbono (Irvingia gabonensis) mix powder. Food Sci. Nutr., 3(4): 313-318.
Bandyopadhyay, K., C. Chakraborty and S. Bhattacharyya, 2014. Fortification of mango peel and kernel powder in cookies formulation. J. Acad. Ind. Res., 2: 661-664.
Benzie, I.F. and J.J. Strain, 1999. Ferric reducing/antioxidant power assay: Direct measure of total antioxidant activity of biological fluids and modified version for simultaneous measurement of total antioxidant power and ascorbic acid concentration. Methods Enzymol., 299: 15-27.
Brewer, M.S., 2011. Natural antioxidants: Sources, compounds, mechanisms of action, and potential applications. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. F., 10(4): 221-246.
Irondi, E.A, R.O. Mohammed, A.F. Balogun, H.I. Tajudeen and O.M. Aleshinloye, 2018. Antioxidant and modulatory properties of kernel flour extracts of three Nigerian local mango varieties on enzymes relevant to metabolic syndrome. Oxid. Antiox. Med. Sci., 8(1): 1-10.
Kuyooro, S.E., E.O. Abam and E.B. Agbede, 2017. Hypolipidemic effects of Irvingia gabonensis-supplemented diets in male albino rats. Biochem. Anal. Biochem., 6(2): 1-5.
Legesse, M.B. and S.A. Emire, 2012. Functional and physicochemical properties of mango seed kernels and wheat flour and their blends for biscuit production. Afr. J. Food Sci. Technol., 3(9): 193-203.
Matsinkou, R.S., J.L. Ngondi, D. Kuate, C. Mbofung and J.E. Oben, 2012. Antioxidant and anti-hyperglycemic potential of pulp extracts of Irvingia wombolu fruits. Biol. Med., 4(1): 10-19.
Montanher, A.B.P., M.G. Pizzolatti and I.M.C. Brighente, 2002. An application of the brine shrimp bioassay for general screening of Brazilian medicinal plants. Acta Farm. Bonaerense, 21(3): 175-800.
Pourreza, N., 2013. Phenolic compounds as potential antioxidant. Jundishapur J. Nat. Pharm. Prod., 8(4): 149-150.
Quazi, S.S., C.A. Fatema and M. Mir, 2017. Brine shrimp bioassay. Bangladesh J. Pharmacol., 12: 186-189.
Williams, J., 2007. The origin of the Soxhlet apparatus. J. Chem. Edu., 84(12): 1913-1918.

Rights and permissions

Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


Cite this Article

Received
Accepted
Published
April 16, 2019
July 3, 2019
December 25, 2019

DOI: http://doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.17.6034