Home            Contact us            FAQs
    
      Journal Home      |      Aim & Scope     |     Author(s) Information      |      Editorial Board      |      MSP Download Statistics

     Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology


Nutritional Diagnosis for Apple by DRIS, CND and DOP

Min Xu, Jianing Zhang, Faqi Wu and Xudong Wang
College of Resource and Environment, Northwest A&F University, No. 3 Taicheng Road, Shaanxi, Yangling 712100, China
Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology  2015  4:266-273
http://dx.doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.7.1306  |  © The Author(s) 2015
Received: July ‎18, ‎2014  |  Accepted: September ‎20, ‎2014  |  Published: February 10, 2015

Abstract

This study derived and compared norms for apple, using the Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS), Compositional Nutrient Diagnosis (CND) and deviation form optimum percentage (DOP) diagnose methods in the Weibei Loess Plateau, Shaanxi Province, China. A total of 68 leaf samples were collected from apple trees grown in Huangshan soils. The nutritional status was diagnosed by the DRIS, CND and DOP methods. The CND norms expressed as row-centered log ratios (mean±standard deviation) for d = 5 nutrients for the high-yield subpopulation (producing more than 46.67 t/ha) were: VN*= 0.998±0.066, Vp* = -1.499±0.124, VK* = -0.189±0.283, VCa* = 0.217±0.213, VMg* = -1.035±0.267, VR5* = 1.508±0.144. The optimum ranges for leaf nutrient concentrations were: N = 27.23±1.79 g/kg, P = 2.26±0.32 g/kg, K = 8.63±2.50 g/kg, Ca = 12.73±2.66 g/kg, Mg = 3.71±1.12 g/kg, R5 = 45.44±3.95 g/kg. The regression relating CND to DRIS and DOP indices were significant linear. There was a multinomial regression equation between CND r2 and DRIS NBI, also between CND r2 and ∑DOP. This study showed that the differences in CND, DRIS and DOP approaches did not lead to large differences in identified deficiencies. So, CND may in practice still be the preferred approach since multivariate methods could be further explored to assess nutrient status in plants, but people can choose any approach they want use since they had the similar evaluation result.

Keywords:

Apple, CND, DOP, DRIS, leaf diagnosis, weibei loess plateau,


References

  1. An, G.Y., 2004. Studies on the standard range of leaf nutritional element content and its effect factors. M.S. Thesis, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shannxi.
  2. Bates, T.E., 1971. Factors affecting critical nutrient concentrations in plant and their evaluation, a review. Soil Sci., 112: 116-130.
    CrossRef    
  3. Beaufils, E.R., 1956. Mineral equilibrium in the foliage and latex of Hevea brasiliensis. Ann. Agron., 2: 205-218.
  4. Beaufils, E.R., 1973. Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS). Soil Sci. Bull. No. 1. University of Natal, Durban, South Africa.
  5. Beverly, R.B., 1987. Modified DRIS method for simplified nutrient diagnosis of 'valencia' oranges. J. Plant Nutr., 10: 1401-1408.
    CrossRef    
  6. Caron, J. and L.E. Parent, 1989. Derivation and assessment of DRIS norms for greenhouse tomatoes. Can. J. Plant Sci., 69: 1027-1035.
    CrossRef    
  7. Chapman, H.D. and P.F. Pratt, 1961. Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants and Waters. University of California, Division of Agricultural Science, Berkeley, CA.
  8. FAO, 2010. FAOSTAT. Retrieved form: http://faostat3.fao.org/home/index.html. (Accessed on: Nov. 30, 2012).
    Direct Link
  9. Gangli, L., S. Runyu and S. Tsuin 1987. Studies on the nutritional ranges in some deciduous fruit trees. Acta Hortic. Sin., 14(2): 81-89.
  10. Goh, K.M. and M.J. Malakouti, 1992. Preliminary nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium DRIS norms and indexes for apple orchards in Canterbury, New Zealand. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan., 23: 1371-1385.
    CrossRef    
  11. Hanson, E.J., 1987. Fertilizer use efficiency: Integrating soil tests and tissue analysis to manage the nutrition of high bush blueberries. J. Plant Nutr., 10: 1419-1427.
    CrossRef    
  12. Hartz, T.K., E.M. Miyao and J.G. Valencia, 1998. DRIS evaluation of the nutritional status of processing tomato. HortScience, 33: 830-832.
  13. Khiari, L., L.E. Parent and N. Tremblay. 2001a. Selecting the high-yielding subpopulation for diagnosing nutrient imbalance in crops. Agron. J., 93: 802-808.
    CrossRef    
  14. Khiari, L., L.E. Parent and N. Tremblay, 2001b. The phosphorus compositional nutrient diagnosis range for potato. Agron. J., 93: 815-819.
    CrossRef    
  15. Khiari, L., L.E. Parent and N. Tremblay, 2001c. Critical compositional nutrient indexes for sweet corn at early growth stage. Agron. J., 93: 809-814.
    CrossRef    
  16. Kumar, P.S.S., S.A. Geetha, P. Savithri, R. Jagadeeswaran and P.P. Mahendran, 2003. Diagnosis of nutrient imbalances and derivation of new RPZI (Reference Population Zero Index) values using DRIS/MDRIS and CND approaches in the leaves of turmeric (Curcuma longa). J. Appl. Hortic., 5: 7-10.
  17. Malavolta, E., S.A. Oliveika and G.C. Vitti, 1993. The use of Diagnosis Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS) to evaluate the nutritional status of healthy and blight affected citrus trees. Proceeding of the 8ht International Colloquium for the Optimization of Plant Nutrition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp: 157-159.
    CrossRef    
  18. Mayfield, J.L., E.H. Simonne, C.C. Mitchell, J.L. Sibley, R.T. Boozera and L. Edgar, 2002. Effect of current fertilization practices on nutritional status of double cropped tomato and cucumber produced with plasticulture. J. Plant Nutr., 25: 1-15.
    CrossRef    
  19. Monta-ésa, L., L. Herasa, J. Abadíaa and M. Sanza, 1993. Plant analysis interpretation based on a new index: Deviation from Optimum Percentage (DOP). J. Plant Nutr., 16(7): 1289-1308.
    CrossRef    
  20. Parent, L.E. and M. Dafir, 1992. A theoretical concept of CND. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 117: 239-242.
  21. Parent, L.E., A. Karam and S.A. Visser, 1993. Compositional nutrient diagnosis of the greenhouse tomato. HortScience, 28: 1041-1042.
  22. Parent, L.E., A.N. Cambouris and A. Muhawenimana, 1994. Multivariate diagnosis of nutrient imbalance in potato crops. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58: 1432-1438.
    CrossRef    
  23. Raghupathi, H.B. and B.S. Bhargava, 1999. Preliminary nutrient norms for 'Alphonso' mango using diagnosis and recommendation integrated system. Indian J. Agr. Sci., 69: 648-650.
  24. Raghupathi, H.B., B.M.C. Reddy and K. Srinivas, 2002. Multivariate diagnosis of nutrient imbalance in banana. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan., 33: 2131-2143.
    CrossRef    
  25. Raj, G.B. and A.P. Rao, 2006. Identification of yield-limiting nutrients in mango through DRIS indices. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan., 37(11): 1761-1774.
    CrossRef    
  26. Schaffer, B., K.D. Larson, G.H. Snyder and C.A. Sanchez, 1988. Identification of mineral deficiencies associated with mango decline by DRIS. HortScience, 23: 617-619.
  27. Singh, N.P., R.P. Awasthi and A. Sud, 2000. Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS) norms for apple (Malus × Domestica Borkh. L. CV. Starking Delicious) in Himachal Pradesh. Indian J. Hortic., 57(3): 196-204.
  28. SPBS (Shaanxi Provence Bureau of Statistic), 2010. Statistical Communique of fruit in Shaanxi Province. Retrieved form: http://www.sn.stats.gov.cn/news/qsgb/201132390305.htm. (Accessed on: Nov. 30, 2012).
  29. Srivastava, A.K. and S. Singh, 2008. DRIS norms and their field validation in Nagpur mandarin. J. Plant Nutr., 31(6): 1091-1107.
    CrossRef    
  30. Walworth, J.L. and M.E. Sumner, 1986. Foliar diagnosis-a review. Adv. Plant Nutr., 3: 193-241.
  31. Zeng, Y.J., 2011. Effect of fertilization on yield and quality of Fuji apple in Shaanxi. M.S. Thesis, Northwest A & F University, Yangling.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.

ISSN (Online):  2042-4876
ISSN (Print):   2042-4868
Submit Manuscript
   Information
   Sales & Services
Home   |  Contact us   |  About us   |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2024. MAXWELL Scientific Publication Corp., All rights reserved