Abstract

The sandwich crowd is housing property owners the standard by social class, but also to public policy coverage as a standard division policy target groups; Based on public policy coverage as a standard by policy target groups. The sandwich layer groups is the direct cause of low-income groups purchase ability is ceaseless and abate, prime cause is the housing speculation demand extrusion low-income groups owner-occupied consumption demand and housing security public policy without timely coverage of low income group. The perfect sandwich layer housing security of the population in public policy, the key is to do low-end security, that they "guarantee" with public rental; midrange market, that the expansion of the middle-income groups, the use of policy instruments to support them buyers; high-end constraint, that is a combination of market, fiscal, administrative, legal and other means, especially the use of property taxes inhibit excessive speculative demand for housing.

Keywords:

Living environment, rural environment, speculative demand,

References

1. Abdul-Aziz, A.R., M. Jaafar and C.L. Loh, 2014. Speculative residential developers and foreign retirees' market segment in Malaysia. Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 37: 38-46.
   CrossRef    
2. Cho, M. and K.H. Kim, 2012. Price dynamics in Housing Markets. International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home, pp: 361-366.
   CrossRef    
3. Earl, P.E., T.C. Peng and J. Potts, 2007. Decision-rule cascades and the dynamics of speculative bubbles. J. Econ. Psychol., 28(3): 351-364.
   CrossRef    
4. Goodman, A.C. and T.G. Thibodeau, 2008. Where are the speculative bubbles in US housing markets? J. Hous. Econ., 17(2): 117-137.
   CrossRef    
5. Huang, M.C., 2014. Bubble-like housing boom-bust cycles: Evidence from the predictive power of households' expectations. Q. Rev. Econ. Financ., 54(1): 2-16.
   CrossRef    
6. Kevin, J., 2012. Lansing speculative growth, overreaction and the welfare cost of technology-driven bubbles. J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 83(3): 461-483.
   CrossRef    
7. Kim, K.H., S.Y. Phang and S. Wachter, 2012. Supply Elasticity of Housing. International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home, pp: 66-74.
   CrossRef    
8. Murphy, E. and M. Scott, 2014. Household vulnerability in rural areas: Results of an index applied during a housing crash, economic crisis and under austerity conditions. Geoforum, 51: 75-86.
   CrossRef    
9. Shih, Y.N., H.C. Li and B. Qin, 2014. Housing price bubbles and inter-provincial spillover: Evidence from China. Habitat Int., 43: 142-151.
   CrossRef    
10. Wu, J., J. Gyourko and Y. Deng, 2012. Evaluating conditions in major Chinese housing markets. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ., 42(3): 531-543.
    CrossRef    
11. Zhu, Y.Y., 2013a. The strategy research of developing the modern agriculture transformation in resources exhausted cities-taking the Wansheng as an example. Adv. J. Food Sci. Technol., 5(6): 758-764.
    CrossRef    
12. Zhu, Y.Y., 2013b. Strategies on accelerating agricultural modernization-taking Tongnan County as an example. Adv. J. Food Sci. Technol., 5(9): 1132-1138.
    CrossRef    
13. Zhu, Y.Y., 2013c. Strategies on accelerating agricultural modernization-taking Qijiang district as an example. Adv. J. Food Sci. Technol., 5(8): 1015-1021.
    CrossRef    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.