Research Article | OPEN ACCESS
Evaluation on Indicator System of Food Economic Project Evaluation based on Combination Weight and TOPSIS
Aiying Shang, Weihua Li, Huijuan Sun, Xiumin Zhao and Zhigang Zheng
XingTai University, Xingtai, Hebei 054001, China
Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology 2015 10:779-784
Received: March 28, 2015 | Accepted: April 22, 2015 | Published: September 20, 2015
Abstract
This study takes the drawback that the project performance has great influence on food enterprise performance into consideration, through the introduction of financial indicators, indicators of internal processes, learning and development indicators, to build a new comprehensive performance evaluation index system for food economic projects. Based on this, performance indicators data of food economic project is collected and then further processed, which lays the foundation for determining indicators weights.
Keywords:
Comprehensive performance, evaluation methods, food enterprise, index system, TOPSIS,
References
-
Fu, Y.H. and Y.L. Xu, 2008. Performance Management [M]. 2nd Edn., Fudan University Press, Shanghai.
-
Herman, A., 2008. Performance Management [M]. China Renmin University Press, Beijing.
-
Luo, X.X. and S.H. Peng, 2011. Research on the vendor evaluation and selection based on AHP and TOPSIS in green supply Chain [J]. Soft Sci., 25(2): 53-56.
Direct Link
-
Lv, H.B., 2009. The efficacy coefficient method in the evaluation of food enterprise performance [J]. InnerMongolia Sci. Technol. Econ., 9: 69-71.
-
Ngacho, C. and D. Das, 2014. A performance evaluation framework of development projects: An empirical study of constituency development fund construction projects in Kenya [J]. Int. J. Proj. Manag., 32(3): 492-507.
CrossRef Direct Link
-
Qu, W.J. and X.Y. Fang, 2014. Assessment of black-start modes based on entropy value method and principal component analysis [J]. Power Syst. Protect. Control, 42(8): 22-27.
Direct Link
-
Song, G.X. and D.L. Yang, 2004. Combination weighting approach based on the decision-maker' s preference and consistency of weighting methods [J]. Syst. Eng. Electron., 26(9): 1226-1230.
Direct Link
-
Sun, Y.H. and H. Luo, 2008. Performance Appraisal Quantitative Management [M]. People's Posts and Telecommunications Press, Beijing, pp: 524-526.
PMid:18471420
-
Wang, T.J. and Y.B. Lai, 2008. Study on the performance evaluation index system of the highway food economic project [J]. Highway Traffic Sci. Technol., 09: 186-191.
-
Wen, H.T. and C.P. Ren, 2011. A new study of non-measurement in evaluation of food enterprise’s performance [J]. Food Econ. Problems, 6: 61-65.
-
Zavadskasn, E.K., T. Vilutiene, Z. Turskis et al., 2014. Multi-criteria analysis of projects' performance in food economic [J]. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 2014: 114-121.
CrossRef
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests.
Open Access Policy
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Copyright
The authors have no competing interests.
|
|
![](http://www.maxwellsci.com/images/AJFST-maxw.jpg) |
ISSN (Online): 2042-4876
ISSN (Print): 2042-4868 |
![Submit Manuscript](../images/sub.jpg) |
Information |
|
|
|
Sales & Services |
|
|
|