Abstract

The main problem of adapting the SRI techniques is high labor requirements for manual and lacking of mechanized system for planting single seedling in the field. The existing seedling preparation methods remain challenging among SRI practitioners due to traumatic condition. This study was intended to create modern techniques for increasing the quality and transplanting potentials to improve seedling preparation and reduce transplanting shock. It involved development of rectangular tray having 924 square growing cavities with sliding base to facilitate seedling transfer. Seed selection was conducted and 100% germination was obtained from the sunken MR219 seeds collected in 80 g/L of NaCl solution. SRI-tray seeding was 100% placed into cavities with SRI-seed picker at 150 g/L of tapioca solution. Two different media (Soil + Burnt husk (1:1) as M1 and Soil + Compost (1:1) as M2) were used to evaluate the growth performances for 10 days. The measured parameters (Seedling Height (SH), Leaf Length (LL), Leaf Number (LN), Root Length (RL) and Loosening Index (LI)) were compared between SRI-tray and conventional ones. The SAS revealed that M2 on SRI-tray had the highest significant values for SH, LL, RL and LI with the mean values of 155.6, 109.3, 89.3 and 75 sec when compared with conventional tray which had 125, 91 and 52 mm with no LI, respectively. The seed rate, nursery area and seedling age to support one hectare of planting area were found as 5.34 kg, 36 m2 and 8-10 days on SRI-tray against 15-50 kg, 250-500 m2 and 12-30 days on conventional practices.

Keywords:

Compost , germination, growing cavities, loosening index, seedling height, vigor,

References

1. Abirami, K., J. Rema, P.A. Mathew, V. Srinivasan and S. Hamza, 2010. Effect of different propagation media on seed germination, seedling growth and vigour of nutmeg (Myristica fragrans Houtt.). J. Med. Plants Res., 4(19): 2054-2058.
   
2. Alagesan, V. and M.N. Budhar, 2009. System of rice intensification: Exploring the level of adoption and problems of discontinuance. Int. Rice Res. Notes, 34: 1-3.
   
3. Anas, I., O.P. Rupela, T.M. Thiyagarajan and N. Uphoff, 2011. A review of studies on SRI effects on beneficial organisms in rice soil rhizospheres. Paddy Water Environ., 9(1): 53-64.
   
4. Balasubramanian, V., 2009. Rice Nursery and Early Crop Management. Powerpoint. Rice Production Course, IRRI.
   
5. Ceesay, M., 2010. An opportunity for increasing factor productivity for rice cultivation in The Gambia through SRI. Paddy Water Environ., 9(1): 129-135.
   
6. Dewangan, K., E. Thomas and B. Ghosh, 2005. Performance evaluation of a laboratory model rice technology. Agric. Eng. Today, 29: 38-45.
   
7. Dhananchezhiyan, P., C.D. Durairaj and S. Parveen, 2013. Development of nursery raising technique for “system of rice intensification” machine transplanting. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 8(29): 3873-3882.
   
8. Egharevba, R.K., M.I. Ikhatua and C. Kalu, 2005. The influence of seed treatments and growing media on seedling growth and development of African walnut, Plukenetia conophorum. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 4(8): 808-811.
   
9. Ella, E.S., M.L. Dionisio-Sese and A.M. Ismail, 2011. Seed pre-treatment in rice reduces damage, enhances carbohydrate mobilization and improves emergence and seedling establishment under flooded conditions. AoB Plants, 2011: plr007.
   
10. Farooq, M., S.M.A. Basra and H. Rehman, 2006. Seed priming enhances emergence yield and quality of direct seeded rice. Int. Rice Res. Notes, 31: 42-44.
    
11. Farooq, M., N. Kabayashi, A. Wahid and O.M. Bassa, 2009. Strategies for producing more rice with less water. Adv. Agron., 101: 351-388.
    
12. Haytham, M.E., M.K. Hassaanein, A. Zahoor and T.M. El. Kotamy, 2010. Rice straw-seedbed for producing rice seedling mat. Int. J. Sustain. Agric., 2(2): 26-33.
    
13. Heydecker, W. and P. Coolbear, 1977. Seed treatment for improved performance of survey and attempted prognosis. Seed Sci. Technol., 5: 353-425.
    
14. Jayakiran, K. and T. Sajitha, 2010. Evaluation of different planting techniques for economic feasibility in rice. J. Environ. Agric. Food Chem., 9: 150-153.
    
15. Kassam, A., W. Stoop and N. Uphoff, 2011. Review of SRI modifications in rice crop and water management and research issues for making further improvements in agricultural and water productivity. Paddy Water Environ., 9(1): 163-180.
    
16. Khem, D.R. and R.B. Khadka, 2012. Performance of rice with varied age of seedlings and planting geometry under system of rice intensification (SRI) in farmer’s field in Western Terai, Nepal. Nepal J. Sci. Technol., 13(2): 1-6.
    
17. Kotschi, J., 2007. Agricultural biodiversity is essential to climate change. Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc., 16: 98-101.
    
18. Laulanié, H., 2003. Le Riz a Madagascar: Un Developpement en Dalogue Avec Les Paysans. In Karthala (Karthala). Antananarivo (Madagascar), Ambozontany, Paris.
    
19. Misha, A. and N.T. Uphoff, 2011. System of rice intensification: 'Less can be more' with climate-friendly technology. SATSA Mukhapatra, 15: 28-39.
    
20. Mishra, A. and V.M. Salokhe, 2008. Seedling characteristics and the early growth of transplanted rice under different water regimes. Exp. Agr., 44(3): 1-19.
    
21. Noltze, M., S. Schwarze and M. Qaim, 2012. Understanding the adoption of system technologies in smallholder agriculture: The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) in timor leste. Agr. Syst., 108: 64-73.
    
22. Pasuquin, E., T. Lafarge and B. Tubana, 2008. Transplanting young seedlings in irrigated rice fields: Early and high tiller production enhanced grain yield. Field Crop. Res., 105(1-2): 141-155.
    
23. Rajendran, R., 1991. Nursery manuring and its effect on seedling growth and yield of rice. Andras Agric. J., 78: 73-75.
    
24. Rajesh, V. and K. Thanunathan, 2003. Effect of seedling age, number and spacing on yield and nutrient uptake of traditional Kambanchamba rice. Madras Agric. J., 90: 47-49.
    
25. Randall, R.J., R. Rajendran, V. Balasubramanian, V. Ravi, K. Valliappan and T. Jayaraj, 2004. Nursery technology for early production of robust rice seedlings to transplant under integrated crop management. IRRN.
    
26. Seniz, V., T. Tunc, Y. Bulut and U. Sahin, 2011. Effects of different growing media on Scotch pine (PINUS SYLVESTRIS) production. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 21(3): 535-541.
    
27. Sun, Y.Y., Y.J. Sun, M.T. Wang, X.Y. Li, X. Guo, R. Hu and J. Ma, 2010. Effects of seed priming on germination and seedling growth under water stress in rice. Acta Agron. Sinica, 36(11): 1931-1940.
    
28. Surya Prabha, A.C., T.M. Thiyagarajan and M. Senthvelu, 2011. System of rice intensification principles on growth parameters, yield attributes and yields of rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Agron., 10(1): 27-33.
    
29. Thomas, V. and A.M. Ramzi, 2011. SRI contributions to rice production dealing with water management constraints in northeastern Afghanistan. Paddy Water Environ., 9(1): 101-109.
    
30. Uphoff, N., L. Fisher and S.R.I. Rice, 2011. Report on SRI visit to Malaysia. July 1-9, Cornell University, pp: 1-20.
    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.