Abstract

Measuring performance has been arguerably, one of the metric with many facets with different school of thoughts, as there exist different approaches of measuring it. Several of the existing approaches measure such metric by comparison with standards esherined in policy documents and as a result, takes less look to its compliance and reliability of values being matched to an established standards. This study seeks to integrate reliability and compliance into measuring of performance of Waste Stabilization Pond (WSP) and Treatment Plant (TP) as well as to generate the appropriate standard chart tables using the Ghana Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved discharge values for physico-chemical and some biological parameters to account for these shortfalls on over reliance of EPA discharge standards. Probability distribution density function was applied on the lognormal distribution function to establish the relationship between the statistical coefficient of variation and the coefficient of reliability based on rth moment about the origin in the moment of generation function to generate the functions of the mean and standard deviation, properties of the standard Z normal distribution were used to establish the coefficient of reliability relationship depending on the coefficient of variation influenced by the standard of deviation. Discharge values of Physico-chemical Parameters measured from the WSP were found be performing acceptably based on the EPA standards, whereas only four of the TP were acceptable. Discharge Values of physico-chemical and biological parameters which are found to be accepted under comparison with EPA standards were found to have compliance levels below what is generally accepted for Waste Stabilization Ponds (WSP) designed compliance. Based on these shortcomings, reference charts were develop to serve as reference points in assessing the various characteristics of compliance and performance of WSPs in Ghana on (28) physico-chemical and biological parameters. These charts are intended to make it easier to assess the performance of WSPs and its corresponding reliability and compliance level to compensate for overreliance on EPA standards alone.

Keywords:

Coefficient of reliability, coefficient of variation, effluent quality discharge, EPA standards, lognormal distribution, performance and compliance , probability of reliability , waste stabilization ponds,

References

1. Gawasiri, C.B., 2003. Modern design of waste stabilization ponds in warm climates: Comparison with traditional design methods. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Leeds, UK.
   
2. Haydeh, H., M. Doosti and M. Sayadi, 2013. Performance evaluation of waste stabilization pond in Birjand, Iran for the treatment of municipal sewage. Int. Acad. Ecol. Environ. Sci., 3(1): 52-58.
   
3. Hovey, W.H., E.D. Schroeder and G. Tschobanoglous, 1977. Optimal Size of Regional Wastewater Treatment Plants. California Water Resources Centre, Contribution No. 161, University of California, Davis.
   PMid:585294    
4. Mara, D., 1996. Waste stabilization ponds: Effluent quality requirements and implications for process design. Water Sci. Technol., 33(7): 23-33.
   CrossRef    
5. Mara, D., 2004. Domestic Wastewater Treatment in Developing Countries. Earthscan, USA.
   
6. Mbwele, L., M. Rubindamayugi, A. Kivaisi and G. Dalhammar, 2003. Performance of a samll wastewater stabilization system in tropical climate in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Water Sci. Technol., 48(11-12): 187-191.
   PMid:14753535    
7. McBride, G.B., 2003. Confidence of compliance: Parametric versus nonparametric approaches. Water Res., 37: 3666-3671.
   CrossRef    
8. McBride, G.B. and J.C. Ellis, 2001. Confidence of compliance: A Bayesian approach for percentile standards. Water Res., 35(5): 1117-1124.
   CrossRef    
9. Metcalf and Eddy, 2003. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse. 4th Edn., Metcalf & Eddy Inc., New York, pp: 1819.
   
10. Niku, S. and E.D. Schroeder, 1981. Factors affecting effluent variability from activated sludge processes. J. Water Pollut. Control Assoc., 53(5): 546-559.
    
11. Niku, S., E.D. Schroeder and F.J. Samaniego, 1979. Performance of activated sludge process and reliability-based design. J. Water Pollut. Control Assoc., 51(12): 2841-2857.
    
12. Niku, S., E.D. Schroeder and R.S. Haugh, 1982. Reliability and stability of trickling filter processes. J. Water Pollut. Control Assoc., 54(2): 129-134.
    
13. Niku, S., E.D. Schroeder, G. Tchobanoglous and F.J. Samaniego, 1981. Performance of activated sludge process: Reliability, stability and variability. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Grant No. R805097-01, pp: 1-124.
    
14. Oakley, S.M., A. Pocasangre, C. Flores, J. Monge and M. Estrada, 2000. Waste stabilization pond use in Central America: The experiences of El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua. Water Sci. Technol., 42(10/11): 51-58.
    
15. Oliveira, S.C. and M.V. Sperling, 2008. Reliability analysis of wastewater treatment plants. J. Water Res., 42: 1182-1194.
    
16. Oliveira, S.M.A.C. and M.V. Sperling, 2006. Wastewater characteristics in a developing country, based on a large survey (166 treatment plants). Proceeding of the 5th IWAWorld Water Congress, Beijing, China.
    CrossRef    PMid:17897694    
17. Ott, W.R., 1995. Environmental Statistics and Data Analysis. Lewis Publishers, New York, pp: 313.
    
18. Ragas, A.M.J., P.A.G.M. Scheren, H.I. Konterman, R.S.E.W. Leuven, P. Vugteveen, H.J. Lubberding, G. Niebeek and P.B.M. Stortelder, 2005. Effluent standards for developing countries: Combining the technology- and water quality-based approach. Water Sci. Technol., 52(9): 133-144.
    PMid:16445182    
19. Redda, M.A., 2013. Studies of the performance, stability and reliability of various configuration of the activated sludge process at full scale municipal wastewater treatment plants. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas at Arlington, US.
    
20. Shah, T.S.K., 2008. Performance evaluation of central wastewater treatment plant: A case study of Hetauda industrial district, Nepal. Environ. Nat. Resour. J., 6(2): 36-51.
    
21. Smith, E.P., K. Ye, C. Hughes and L. Shabman, 2001. Statistical assessment of violations of water quality standards under section 303(d) of the clean water act. Environ Sci. Technol., 35: 606-612.
    CrossRef    PMid:11351736    
22. Thode, H.C., 2002. Testing for Normality. Marcel Dekker, New York.
    CrossRef    PMCid:PMC2447339    
23. WHO, 2006. Guidelines for the Safe Use of Watewater, Excreta and Greywater. Volume 2: Wastewater Use in Agricluture. WHO, Geneva.
    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.