Abstract

This study presents a visual approach to analyze scientific activity in indexed journals based on bibliometric indicators. The result of this analysis approach supports the process of choosing a journal to submit a manuscript, especially in knowledge domains where the author, whether novice or not, has failed to follow in detail the evolution of the domain. Moreover, the same approach can be used to an overall assessment of the production of researchers, research groups, institutions and countries. The conceptual foundations of the approach are volume and citation indicators of scientific journals articles. In particular, the proposed approach is based on SCImago Journal Rank index, the h-index and the annual number of articles published. The above indicators are transformed into percentiles and then displayed on a graph, integrating in this diagram the set of articles to be analyzed. The analysis approach was implemented in Sweet Spots for Manuscripts, online software based on open source components. As an example of its potential, an analysis of the 2014 research activity of the institutions belonging to the Council of Rectors of Chilean Universities is presented. Finally, the practical implications and opportunities for future research are discussed.

Keywords:

Academic journals, bibliometric indicators, Chilean universities, visualization,

References

1. Arenas, J. and R. García, 2005. Revisión meta-analítica de la literatura como guía para la investigación. Proceeding of the 15th Spanish-Portuguese Meeting of Scientific Management (XV Jornadas Hispano-Lusas de Gestión Científica), University of Seville, pp: 39-55.
   
2. Carbonell, X. and N. Calvó, 2009. Las revistas españolas de Psicología: Cómo elegir la revista donde publicar. An. Psicol., 25(2): 209-216.
   
3. Chandy, P.R. and T.G.E. Williams, 1994. The impact of journals and authors on international business research: A citational analysis of JIBS articles. J. Int. Bus. Stud., 25(4): 715-728.
   CrossRef    
4. Chen, C., 2006. Knowledge Domain Visualization. Information Visualization: Beyond the Horizon. Springer, London.
   
5. Chen, C. and D. Hicks, 2004. Tracing knowledge diffusion. Scientometrics, 59(2): 199-211.
   CrossRef    
6. González-Pereira, B., V.P. Guerrero-Bote and F. Moya-Anegón, 2010. A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. J. Informetr., 4(3): 379-391.
   CrossRef    
7. Hirsch, J.E., 2005. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 102(46): 16569-16572.
   CrossRef    PMid:16275915 PMCid:PMC1283832    
8. Kelner, K., 2007. Tips for Publishing in Scientific Journals. Science Careers, April 6. Retrieved from: http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_development/previous_issues/articles/2007_04_06/caredit_a 0700046/ (parent)/158. (Accessed on: September 5, 2007).
   
9. Knight, G.A., G.T. Hult and E. Bashaw, 2000. Research Productivity in the journal of business research: 1985-1999. J. Bus. Res., 49(3): 303-314.
   CrossRef    
10. Kraker, P., C. Schlögl, K. Jack and S. Lindstaedt, 2015. Visualization of co-readership patterns from an online reference management system. J. Informetr., 9(1): 169-182.
    CrossRef    
11. Larsen, P.O. and M. Von Ins, 2010. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by science citation index. Scientometrics, 84(3): 575-603.
    CrossRef    PMid:20700371 PMCid:PMC2909426    
12. Ramírez, P.E. and J.L. Alfaro, 2012. Desincentivo a la investigación: Resultado del comportamiento inequitativo del modelo de Aporte Fiscal Directo (AFD) a las universidades chilenas. Form. Univ., 5(4): 27-36.
    
13. Ramírez, P.E. and J.L. Alfaro, 2013. Evaluación de la eficiencia de las universidades pertenecientes al consejo de rectores de las Universidades Chilenas: Resultados de un análisis envolvente de datos. Form. Univ., 6(3): 31-38.
    
14. Ramirez-Correa, P. and R. García-Cruz, 2004. El meta análisis como instrumento de investigación en la determinación y análisis del objeto de studio. Proceeding of the 16th Meeting of University Professors of Marketing (Actas de los XVI Encuentros de Profesores Universitarios de Marketing), Alicante, pp: 341-357.
    
15. Resta, R.G., P. Mccarthy Veach, S. Charles, K. Vogel, T. Blase and C.G.S. Palmer, 2010. Publishing a master’s thesis: A guide for Novice authors. J. Genet. Couns., 19(3): 217-227.
    
16. Sa´nchez-Meca, J., 1999. Metaana´lisis Para la Investigacio´n Cienti´fica. In: Sarabia, F.J. (Ed.), Metodologi´a Para la Investigacio´n en Marketing y Direccio´n de Empresas. Ediciones Pira´mide, Madrid, pp: 173-200.
    
17. Sarabia, F.J., 1999. Definición Del Tema a Investigar. In: Sarabia, F.J. (Ed.), Metodologi´a Para la Investigacio´n en Marketing y Direccio´n de Empresas. Ediciones Pira´mide, Madrid, pp: 69-94.
    
18. Zinkhan, G.M., M. Roth and M.J. Saxton, 1992. Knowledge development and scientific status in consumer behavior research: A social exchange perspective. J. Consum. Res., 19(2): 282-291.
    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.