Abstract

In the present decade along the increasing trend of using private vehicles, calming the local streets and residential areas has been important for local authorities. There are many unsuccessful experiences of traffic calming implementations because of lacking knowledge and engineered assessment before implementing them. Considering the design speed of traffic, calming measure is an essential factor to employ these measures. Design speed of different size of speed humps is investigated in previous studies because of its circular shape but for speed tables it is unknown. In this research the design speeds of two common speed tables in the city of Tehran have been examined, 6.5 and 8.5 m speed table. For calculating the design speed of the speed tables, we asked 220 drivers to participate in our experiment by installing a GPS tracker in their vehicles and encouraging them to drive normally. Crossing speeds over 6.5 and 8.5 m speed tables have been analyzed by collecting totally 220 samples. We pick out 100 correct samples for each speed table and the 85th percentile speed has been calculated for them, consequently the results of 85th percentile calculation of the crossing speeds have been proposed as the design speeds. For 6.5 m speed table, design speed is calculated 41.5 km/h and for 8.5 m speed table, design speed is calculated 47.5 km/h. the comparison of recent findings and past finding of 9.5 m speed table which is used in Denmark with a design speed of 80 km/h reveals that 1 m increasing with the length of a 6.5 speed table plateau will result 3 km/h increase in its design speed. The findings of this research can help traffic calming experts to take in consideration of the relation between speed table physical characteristics and its design speed. Furthermore by finding the design speed of speed tables, we can choose suitable speed tables for streets with different speed limits according to the design speed of speed tables.

Keywords:

Crossing speed, design speed, speed limit, speed table, traffic calming,

References

1. AASHTO, 2004. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washingtn, DC.
   
2. Currin, T.R., 2011. Introduction to Traffic Engineering: A Manual for Data Collection and Analysis. Nelson Engineering, Cengage Learning, Independence, KY.
   
3. Daniel, B.D., A. Nicholson and G. Koorey, 2012. The effects of vertical speed control devices on vehicle speed and noise emission. Proceeding of the ARRB Conference. Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
   
4. Engineers, D., 2001. Traffic Calming Protocol Manual. Municipality of Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska.
   
5. Ewing, R.H., 1999. Traffic Calming: State of the Practice. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C.
   
6. Ewing, R., 2001. Impacts of traffic calming.Transport. Quart., 55(1): 33-46.
   
7. García, A., A.J. Torres, M.A. Romero and A.T. Moreno, 2011. Traffic microsimulation study to evaluate the effect of type and spacing of traffic calming devices on capacity. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 16: 270-281.
   CrossRef    
8. Roess, R.P., E.S. Prassas and W.R. McShane, 2004. Traffic Engineering. 3rd Edn., Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
   PMid:15663177    
9. Transportation, T.D.O., 2000. Procedures for Establishing Speed Zones. State or Province Government Publication, Austin, Texas.
   
10. Transportation, P.D.O., 2001. Pennsylvania`s Traffic Calming Handbook. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Pennsylvania.
    
11. Weber, P.A. and J.P. Braaksma, 2000. Towards a North American geometric design standard for speed humps. ITE J., 70(1): 30-39.
    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.