Research Article | OPEN ACCESS
Marketization of Higher Education Institute; Identifying a Set of Performance Measurements Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process
1Neda Jalaliyoon, 1Nooh Abu Bakar and 2Hamed Taherdoost
1Malaysia-Japan International Institute of Technology (MJIIT)
2Advance Informatics School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 2014 8:912-918
Received: February 22, 2014 | Accepted: March 20, 2014 | Published: August 25, 2014
Abstract
Nowadays, Higher Education is bearing significant alters. These alters are in replying to diversity factors; the expansion of information and communication technologies, globalization, internationalization and regionalization, progress network society, developing information society, socio-cultural orientations and demographical orientations. The marketization in higher education leads to change the roles of Governments.
Keywords:
AHP , key measurer, multiple criteria decision making , performance evaluation , university,
References
-
American Psychological Association, 2008. How technology changes everything (and nothing) in psychology: Annual report of the APA policy and planning board. Am. Psychol., 64: 454-463.
-
Anninos, L.N. and L. Chytiris, 2008. University performance evaluation: Is it an enabler of effective university management or just a fad? Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Economics. Athens, Hellas.
-
Azma, F., 2010. Qualitative indicators for the evaluation of universities performance. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sc., 2(2): 5408-5411.
CrossRef -
Banta, T. and V. Borden, 1994. Performance indicators for accountability and improvement. New Dir. Inst. Res., 82: 95-106.
CrossRef -
Birch, D.W., 1977. A Case Study of Some Performance Indicators in Higher Education in the United Kingdom.
Direct Link -
Borden, B., 1994. Using Performance Indicators to Guide Strategic Decision Making. Jossey Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
-
Busin, J., 2003. Effective Measurement & Use of Key Performance Indicators.
Direct Link -
Carrin, G. and C. James, 2005. Key Performance Indicators for the Implementation of Social Health Insurance.
Direct Link -
Cave, M., M. Kogan and S. Hanney, 1990. The Scope and Effects of Performance Measurement in British Higher Education. In: Dochy, F.J.R.C., M.S.R. Segers and W.H.F.W. Wynand (Eds.), Management Information and Performance Indicators in Higher Education. Van Gorcum, Maastricht, pp: 47-58.
-
Chalkley, B., 2006. Education for sustainable development: Continuation. J. Geogr. Higher Educ., 30(2): 235-236.
CrossRef -
Ciobanu, A., 2013. The role of student services in the improving of student experience in higher education. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 92(2013): 169-173.
CrossRef -
Cuenin, S., 1987. The use of performance indications: An international survey. Int. J. Inst. Manage. High. Educ., 11(2): 117-139.
-
Doyle, K., 1995. Integrating performance measurement and resource planning in the university planning process. J. Inst. Res. Aust., 4(1): 1-6.
-
Ewell, P.T., 1999. Linking performance measures to resource allocation: Exploring unmapped terrain. Qual. High. Educ., 5(3): 191-208.
CrossRef -
Eynde, J.V., 2002. A Case Study of Global Performance Indicators in Crime Prevention.
Direct Link -
Frank, D.J. and J.W. Meyer, 2007. University expansion and the knowledge society. Theor. Soc., 36: 287-311.
CrossRef -
Fuhrman, S.H., 1999. The New Accountability. CPRE Policy Brief, CPRE Publisher.
-
Fuhrman, S.H., 2003. Redesigning Accountability Systems for Education. CPRE Policy Brief, CPRE Publisher.
-
Goodman, P.S., 2001. Technology Enhanced Learning: Opportunities for Change. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
-
Guolla, M., 1999. Assessing the teaching quality to student satisfaction relationship: Applied customer satisfaction research in the classroom. J. Mark. Theor. Pract., 7(3): 87-97.
CrossRef -
Hallahan, D.P. and J.M. Kauffman, 1989. Exceptional Learners: Introduction to Special Education. Allyn and Bacon.
-
Harveya, L. and D. Greena, 1993. Defining quality. Assessment Eval. High. Educ., 18(1): 9-34.
CrossRef -
Hsieh, L.F., 2004. The performance indicator of university e-library in Taiwan.
Direct Link -
Hung-Yi, W., Y.K. Linand C.H. Chang, 2011. Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecard. Eval. Program Plann., 34: 37-50.
CrossRef PMid:20619892 -
Jalaliyoon, N. and H. Taherdoost, 2012. Performance evaluation of higher education: A necessity. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 46: 568.2-5686.
-
Jalaliyoon, N., N.A. Bakar and H. Taherdoost, 2012. Accomplishment of critical success factor in organization; using analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Acad. Res. Manage., 1(1): 1-9.
-
Kells, H.R., 1992. An analysis of the nature and recent development of performance indicators in higher education. High. Educ. Manage., 4(2): 131-138.
-
King, A., 2000. The changing face of accountability: Monitoring and assessing institutional performance in higher education. J. High. Educ., 71(4): 411-431.
CrossRef -
Krishnan, A., C.K. Mow, J.M. Shaikh and A.H. Isa, 2008. Measurement of performance at institutions of higher learning: The balanced score card approach. J. Manage. Financ. Account., 1(2): 199-212.
CrossRef -
Lee, S.H., 2010. Using fuzzy AHP to develop intellectual capital evaluation model for assessing their performance contribution in a university. Expert Syst. Appl., 37: 4941-4947.
CrossRef -
Leen, M.Y., S. Hamid, M.T. Ijab and H.P. Soo, 2009. The e-balanced scorecard (e-BSC) for measuring academic staff performance excellence. High. Educ., 57: 813-828.
CrossRef -
L�fstr�m, E., 2002. In Search of Methods to Meet Accountability and Transparency Demands in Higher Education: Experience from Benchmarking, Socrates Intensive Programme Comparative Education Policy Analysis. Lake Bohinj, Slovenia, pp: 21-30.
-
Lozano, R., 2006. Incorporation and institutionalization of SD into universities: Breaking through barriers to change. J. Clean. Prod., 14: 787-796.
CrossRef -
Lozano, R., R. Lukman, F.J. Lozano, D. Huisingh and W. Lambrechts, 2013. Declarations for sustainability in higher education: Becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system. J. Clean. Prod., 48: 10-19.
CrossRef -
Marzo-Navarro, M., M. Pedraja-Iglesias and M.P. Rivera-Torres, 2005. Measuring customer satisfaction in summer courses. Qual. Assur. Educ., 13(1): 53-65.
CrossRef -
McInnis, C., 2004. Studies of Student Life: An overview. Eur. J. Educ., 39(4).
CrossRef -
O'Neill, M. and A. Palmer, 2004. Importance-performance analysis: a useful tool for directing continuous improvement in higher education. Qual. Assur. Educ., 12(1): 39-52.
CrossRef -
Peng, H., C.C. Tsaia and Y.T. Wua, 2006. University students' self-efficacy and their attitudes toward the internet: The role of students' perceptions of the internet. Educ. Stud., 32(1): 73-86.
CrossRef -
Plumm, K.M., 2008. Technology in the classroom: Burning the bridges to the gaps in gender-based education. Comput. Educ., 50: 1052-1068.
CrossRef -
Pounder, J., 1999. Institutional performance in higher education: Is quality a relevant concept? Qual. Assur. Educ., 7(3): 156-165.
CrossRef -
Rubinson, J. and M. Pfeiffer, 2005. Brand Key Performance Indicator as a Force for Brand Equity Management.
Direct Link -
Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill International, New York.
Direct Link -
Saaty, T.L., K. Peniwati and J. Shang, 2007. The analytic hierarchy process and human resource allocation: Half the story. Math. Comput. Model., 46(7): 1041-1053.
CrossRef -
Shyjith, K., M. Ilangkumaran and S. Kumanan, 2008. Methodology and theory multi-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate optimum maintenance strategy in textile industry. J. Qual. Maint. Eng., 14(4): 375-386.
CrossRef -
Speaker, K., 2004. Student perspectives: Expectations of multimedia technology in a college literature class. Read. Improvement, 4: 241-254.
-
Taherdoost, H., S. Sahibuddin, M. Namayandeh and N. Jalaliyoon, 2011. Propose an educational plan for computer ethics and information security. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci., 28: 815-819.
CrossRef -
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization), 2002. The role of student affairs and services in higher education: A practical manual for developing, implementing and assessing student affairs programes and services. Proceeding of the Follow-up to the World Conference on Higher Education. UNESCO, Paris.
-
Vidovich, L. and R. Slee, 2001. Bringing universities to account? Exploring some global and local policy tensions. J. Educ. Policy, 16(5): 431-432.
CrossRef -
Vieira, A.C.V. and A.J.M. Cardoso, 2010. The role of information logistics and data warehousing in educational facilities asset management. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manage., 1(3): 229-238.
CrossRef -
Waas, T., A. Verbruggen and T. Wright, 2010. University research for sustainable development: definition and characteristics explored. J. Clean. Prod., 18(7): 629-636.
CrossRef -
Wakim, N.T. and D.S. Bushnell, 1999. Performance evaluation in a campus environment. Nat. Prod. Rev., 19(1): 19-27.
CrossRef -
Welsh, J. and J. Metcalf, 2003. Administrative support for institutional effectiveness activities: Responses to the new accountability. J. High. Educ. Policy Manag., 25(2): 183-192.
CrossRef -
Wiers-Jenssen, J., B. Stensaker and J.B. Grogaard, 2002. Student satisfaction: Towards an empirical deconstruction of the concept. Qual. High. Educ., 8(2): 183-195.
CrossRef -
Zilahy, G. and D. Huisingh, 2009. The roles of academia in regional sustainability initiatives. J. Clean. Prod., 17(2): 1057-1066.
CrossRef
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests.
Open Access Policy
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Copyright
The authors have no competing interests.
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4acf/e4acf79cbe9b4736aefdcc642ab76453dbe079db" alt="" |
ISSN (Online): 2040-7467
ISSN (Print): 2040-7459 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/758c4/758c48faf20bd0383112e2661af4fa22e0d505db" alt="Submit Manuscript" |
Information |
|
|
|
Sales & Services |
|
|
|