Abstract

This study aims to uncover the hidden geometry that regulates and orders the design of the Douglas House by Richard Meier. Richard Meier, over a five decade career, has been associated with a recognizable design language that has a clear set of formal characteristics and design themes, including among others: geometrical order exemplified in the use of modules and proportions and visual layering that organizes space in his buildings through the arrangement of successive planes across the visual field. Taking the Douglas house as a case study, the aim of the study is to show how these themes and motifs are employed in a particular building with a particular emphasis upon the geometrical ordering of building plans and elevations and the modular and proportional systems entailed in this ordering. This choice of emphasis is not coincidental: while other aspects of Meier’s language may be equally important from the point of view of the perceptual qualities or the aesthetic judgment of his buildings, geometrical ordering most closely regulates and interacts with the overall arrangement of formal elements of the building. The study concludes that the final form of the house depends on the interaction between a design program and a formal language but is not determined solely by any. Abstract spatial themes such as reversal and twin phenomena also materialize in the physical form of the building through the artful manipulation of design elements.

Keywords:

Formal language, geometry and proportion, motifs and spatial themes,

References

1. Cassarà, S., 2005. Richard Meier-Recent Works. Rizzoli Intl Pubns, New York.
   PMid:15611540 PMCid:PMC1726525    
2. Dahabreh, S.M., 2006. The formulation of design: The case of the Isli|p courthouse by Richard Meier. Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
   
3. Din, E. and A. Economou, 2012. Surface symmetries: The smith house revisited. Int. J. Archit. Comput., 4(8): 485-505.
   
4. Frampton, K., 1991. Works in Transition. In: Frampton, K. and J. Rykwert (Eds.), Richard Meier: Architect 2. Rizzoli, New York, pp: 10-17.
   
5. Frampton, K., 2002. Richard Meier. Electa Architecture, Milano.
   PMCid:PMC125347    
6. Giovannini, J., 1996. Is Richard Meier really modern? Architecture, 85(2): 65-69.
   
7. Goldberger, P., 1974. The Douglas House. GA Global Architecture. 34. A.D.A.EDITA, Tokyo. Unpaginated.
   PMCid:PMC343391    
8. Göussel, P. and G. Leuthäuser, 2005. Architecture in the 20th Century. Volume 2, Taschen, Köln.
   
9. Hanlon, D., 2009. Compositions in Architecture. 1st Edn., Wiley, London.
   
10. Hutt, D., 1999. Introduction: Richard Meier, Light + Space Architect. In: Green, L.J. (Ed.), Richard Meier: Architect Monacelli Press, New York, pp: 8-11.
    
11. Meier, R., 2007. Preface. In: Richard Meier: Houses and Apartment. Edn., B&W and color illustrations, pp: 207.
    
12. Morton, D., 1973. GA Global Architecture 22 Richard Meier. 1st Edn., Japan Edita. Unpaginated. Print.
    
13. Peponis, J., C. Karadima and S. Bafna, 2003. On the formulation of spatial meaning in architectural design. Proceedings of the 4th International Space Syntax Symposium, London, pp: 2.1-2.20.
    
14. Richards, I., 1993. Interactive languages. Archit. Rev., pp: 23-37.
    
15. Rowe, C., 1975. Five Architects. Oxford University Press, USA.
    
16. Rykwert, J., 1984. Introduction. Richard Meier, Architect: 1964-1984. Rizzoli International Publications, New York, pp: 14-23.
    
17. Rykwert, J., 1991. The Second Installment. In: Frampton, K. and J. Rykwert (Eds.), Richard Meier, New York, pp: 18-25.
    
18. Tafuri, M., 1976. American Graffiti: Five x five = twenty-five. Oppositions, 5(summer 1976): 68.
    
19. Unwin, S., 2003. Analyzing Architecture. 2nd Edn., Routledge, London and New York.
    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.