Abstract

In the continuing effort to improve the system analysis and design process, several different approaches have been developed. This study will propose a new process methodology solves some problems in traditional system development methodologies it will study the strength and limitation of existing system development methodologies from traditional waterfall to iterative model including (Prototyping, Spiral, Rapid Application Development, XP and RUP) to Agility. Propose a new methodology focus on produce a high quality product and suitable for all kind of project. Compare the new methodology with others to view some features that is differentiating it from previous methodologies.

Keywords:

Multimedia technology, , quality improvement, , software process model, , software quality, , software systems,

References

1. Abrahamson, P. and N. Baddoo?, 2007. Software process model. Proceeding of 14th European Conference. Euro SPI Potsdam, Germany.
   
2. Aggarwal, K.K. and Y. Singh, 2005. Software Engineering. 2nd Edn., New Age International Publishers, New Delhi.
   
3. Aranda, J., S. Easterbrook and G. Wilson, 2007. Requirements in the wild: How small companies do it. Proceeding of 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2007), pp: 39-48.
   CrossRef    
4. Chandrasehakhar, K., 2005. Software Engineering & Quality Assurance. BPB, 2005.
   
5. Dan, P. and M. Russ, 2008. Head First Software Development. O'Reilly, Sebastopol, CA.
   
6. Gottesdiener, E., 2005. The Software Requirements Memory Jogger: A Desktop Guide to Help Software and Business Teams Develop and Manage Requirements. GOAL/QPC, Salem, NH.
   
7. James, A.W., 2009. Exploratory Software Testing: Tips, Tricks, Tours and Techniques to Guide Test Design. Pearson Education Publisher, ISBN: 0321647858, 9780321647856.
   
8. Janzen, D. and H. Saiedian, 2005. Test-driven development concepts, taxonomy and future directions. Computer, 38(9): 43-50.
   CrossRef    
9. Karl, E.W., 2005. More About Software Requirements: Thorny Issues and Practical Advice. Microsoft Press.
   
10. Lewis, W., 2005. Software Testing and Continuous Quality Improvement. 2nd Edn., CRC Press, Boca Raton.
    
11. O'Connor?, R., N. Baddoo and J.C. Gallego, 2009?. Software process improvement. Proceeding of 16th European Conference, Euro SPI 2009, Alcaba (Madrid), Spain.
    
12. Pine, F.J., F. García and M. Piattini, 2008. Software process improvement in small and medium software enterprises: A systematic review. Software Qual. Control, 16(2): 237-261.
    CrossRef    
13. Pressman, R.S., 2005. Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach. 6th Edn., McGraw-Hill, New York.
    
14. Schulmeyer, G., 2008. Handbook of Software Quality Assurance. Artech House, Boston.
    
15. Thayer, R.H. and M.J. Christensen, 2005. Software Engineering. 3rd Edn., The Development Pro¬ce¬¬¬ss, Wiley and Sons, New York.
    
16. Timothy, C.L. and R. Laganière, 2005. Object-oriented Software Engineering: Practical Software Development using UML and Java. 2nd Edn., McGraw-Hill, New York.
    
17. Weinberg, G., 2008. Perfect Software and Other Illusions about Testing. Dorset House.
    
18. Wiegers, K., 2005. Software Requirements. 2nd Edn., Microsoft Press, 2005.
    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.